Neither. People calling Hillary "Hildabeast" think it is appropriate given her behavior. On whom it reflects poorly depends solely on one's political bent and is thus immaterial.
Results should be taken with a large grain of salt as the calculation there is based on one poll from a relatively unknown pollster. Could be real, could be not.
I agree. Hillary is guaranteed a win, between the Impenetrable Black firewall, positive media spin,Superdelegate advantage I do not see Sanders winning any states at all. She already won 2 states right off the bat.
I agree. Hillary is guaranteed a win, between the Impenetrable Black firewall, positive media spin,Superdelegate advantage I do not see Sanders winning any states at all. She already won 2 states right off the bat.
Sanders is facing an uphill battle but it's pretty unlikely he won't win any state. For example I doubt the current 4 superdelegates Hillary has in Vermont right now would be enough to steal a victory from his home state.
I disagree.
I think it is behaviour that in a subtle way contributes to the current state of political discourse.
If you accept making fun of people elected to political office by using disrespectful names then it is, imo, easier to be impolite to them.
You don't have to respect the person in office but try to respect the office....
True, but black trumps female. Hillary is female, whereas Sanders is an old white man and EVERYTHING trumps old white man. Maybe if Sanders began dressing as a woman you'd be correct, but otherwise not.
Note: I am assuming that transgendered old white woman outranks old white woman on the victim scale. Now if Hillary then came out as a lesbian so that we had old white transwoman against old white lesbian, THAT would be a race worthy of taking on the Republican circus on equal terms. Otherwise it's Hill's to lose.