dullard
Elite Member
- May 21, 2001
- 25,472
- 3,974
- 126
Look over the tax situation again. Taxwise, a 529 is equal to (if you don't get to deduct contributions) or better than (if you do get to deduct contributions) when compared to the Roth IRA that you say is so much better. Either way, the gains are tax free. You are more restricted with the 529, but assuming the restrictions either don't matter or don't apply, then the 529 is often better tax wise.I totally understand your point, but an HSA has... uhhh...a certain... REQUIREMENT... that is a bit large compared to others.
It means you have to have shitty insurance at all times if you want to contribute. Anyone that is employed is likely in the same boat. Don't get me wrong, I would totally have an HSA if my insurance wasn't so good.
My point still remains, you're an idiot if you fund a 529 but don't max out your 401k/IRA.
HSA aren't necessarilly shitty insurance either. I have had one for years. My monthly premium for a FAMILY is under $40, yearly doctor and eye visits are free, and I get the lowest negotiated insurance costs for specialists and prescriptions, although I generally pay for that out of pocket. In a normal year, my family pays <$40*12 = <$480 total. In the WORST case scenario, I have to pay the maximum out of pocket amount ($6000 for my family at my employer, $12,900 maximum for a family by law). So, my health bills range from <$480 in a typical year to $6000 in the absolute worst case scenario year. I wouldn't call that shitty at all. I know a lot of families on normal insurance that pay nearly $5000 a year in premiums AFTER their company pays a good chunk of it and then their costs just go up after that depending on how much health care they use.
