50mm f/1.4 vs 50mm f/1.2L Is the cost worth it? | Bought the Sigma 50mm f/1.4

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JohnnyRebel

Senior member
Feb 7, 2011
762
0
0
I have both the 1.;4 and 1.2. The 1.2 is really somewhat of a special purpose lens - I use it frequently for very low light conditions. It is a very tricky lens to use because when wide open, the DOF is so shallow. (about .35-in) I would recommend sticking with the 1.8 and 1.4 for most users.

As for your question regarding "worth the cost," probably not unless the cost is relatively insignificant. It is a big, heavy, beautiful piece of glass. It also takes big 72mm filters.

+1
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
FYI, here are the 1.4 and 1.2 lenses side by side . . .
2_lenses.jpg
 

alfa147x

Lifer
Jul 14, 2005
29,303
103
106
I think im going to look for a used Sigma 1.4 and then compair it to Canon 50 1.4 at work. If I think the difference is worth it I'll keep the sigma. If not I'll sell / return it.

Thanks guys!
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
If a 50 f/1.2L focuses at .35 inches then what can a 50 f/1.0L do?

The minimum focus distance for the f/1.2L is 45 cm or 18 inches. The discontinued f/1.0L minimum is 23cm or 9 inches.

This is the actual focusing window on the f/1.2L:
50mm.jpg
 
Last edited:

alfa147x

Lifer
Jul 14, 2005
29,303
103
106
Oh I didn't mean focusing distance. CorkyG you said that the 1.2L at f/1.2 only .35 inches of the image is in focus. Taking that how much of the image is in focus at f/1.0 on a 50mm 1.0L?
 

RobDickinson

Senior member
Jan 6, 2011
317
4
0
Oh I didn't mean focusing distance. CorkyG you said that the 1.2L at f/1.2 only .35 inches of the image is in focus. Taking that how much of the image is in focus at f/1.0 on a 50mm 1.0L?


How much of the image is in focus ( in the plane of focus) depends on the depth of field.

This varies due to changes in the focus distance and aperture.

have a play with this:
http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

The 50mmf1.2L on a 5D2 focused on someone 5m away (full body portrait ish) gives a DOF of 71cm.

F1.0 gives a DOF of 60cm in the same situation.

So not all that different.
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
Like Rob said . . . DOF=Depth of Field.
 

alfa147x

Lifer
Jul 14, 2005
29,303
103
106
I am about to order the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 I have shoot this weekend so I wanted to make sure I'm ready to go... Does anyone know if it comes with a lens hood?
 

RobDickinson

Senior member
Jan 6, 2011
317
4
0
Sigma 50! You have to judge the flare just right but its beautiful when you get it.

I found I need less obvious flare in the viewfinder, once its some/lots in the viewfinder its too much on the shot.
 

alfa147x

Lifer
Jul 14, 2005
29,303
103
106
Sigma 50! You have to judge the flare just right but its beautiful when you get it.

I found I need less obvious flare in the viewfinder, once its some/lots in the viewfinder its too much on the shot.

Oh wow. That's going to be fun
I'm looking forward to this lens. It'll be my first non canon lens. I love that it comes with a 4 year warranty
 

alfa147x

Lifer
Jul 14, 2005
29,303
103
106
img0396j.jpg

f/1.4
img0397ta.jpg

f/1.8
img0398teb.jpg

f/2.2
img0399xw.jpg

f/2.8

those are a bit under exposed. So far I like the lens. I need to play around with the AF

With the 5DII I do a lot more MF so it may be a while till I notice anything
 

RobDickinson

Senior member
Jan 6, 2011
317
4
0
Remember canon 'fudge' exposure for their own fast lenses , esoecially on FF bodies, best to dial in some + ec with the sigma.