• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

5 minutes of response needed before bestbuy CLOSES, SHOULD I BUY CALL OF DUTY?

for $49.99? 😕

I'm really anal about PC games and I haven't liked any shooter since Return to Castle Wolfenstein (what a fine piece of game it is, solid in both SP and MP)

I just played two demos for COD and I like it a lot, the only drawback I hear is that the SP is pretty shot and MP is luke warm at best...

BestBuy closes in 15 mins, should I go buy one???
 
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
Battle Field 1942 is where its at.

BF runs like crap on my PC and I don't like the 'feel' of the game. COD feels rock solid with its control and movement, plus it being Quake3 engine, it runs very smoothly on my XP1700 + GF3 64mb @ 1024 x 768.

 
NOOOO

wait till the price drops, the game lasts about 3 hours, and has no real story. just a bunch of levels, you're best off waiting
 
Originally posted by: LOLyourFace
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
Battle Field 1942 is where its at.

BF runs like crap on my PC and I don't like the 'feel' of the game. COD feels rock solid with its control and movement, plus it being Quake3 engine, it runs very smoothly on my XP1700 + GF3 64mb @ 1024 x 768.

Blasphemer.
BAN, BAN, BAN.
BF is the greatest game in the history of PC gaming.

And BF runs perfectly smooth on my XP1700+ with GF3 Ti200 @ 1024x768 with medium detail settings.

As other's said, you can get COD cheaper than that, so no need to rush to judgement.
 
Originally posted by: LOLyourFace
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
Battle Field 1942 is where its at.

BF runs like crap on my PC and I don't like the 'feel' of the game. COD feels rock solid with its control and movement, plus it being Quake3 engine, it runs very smoothly on my XP1700 + GF3 64mb @ 1024 x 768.

and all the guys in call of duty run like monkies, so it has that goin for it...
 
Originally posted by: Shanti
Originally posted by: LOLyourFace
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
Battle Field 1942 is where its at.

BF runs like crap on my PC and I don't like the 'feel' of the game. COD feels rock solid with its control and movement, plus it being Quake3 engine, it runs very smoothly on my XP1700 + GF3 64mb @ 1024 x 768.

Blasphemer.
BAN, BAN, BAN.
BF is the greatest game in the history of PC gaming.

And BF runs perfectly smooth on my XP1700+ with GF3 Ti200 @ 1024x768 with medium detail settings.

As other's said, you can get COD cheaper than that, so no need to rush to judgement.

no, bf1942 sucks.
 
Originally posted by: Shanti
Originally posted by: LOLyourFace
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
Battle Field 1942 is where its at.

BF runs like crap on my PC and I don't like the 'feel' of the game. COD feels rock solid with its control and movement, plus it being Quake3 engine, it runs very smoothly on my XP1700 + GF3 64mb @ 1024 x 768.

Blasphemer.
BAN, BAN, BAN.
BF is the greatest game in the history of PC gaming.

And BF runs perfectly smooth on my XP1700+ with GF3 Ti200 @ 1024x768 with medium detail settings.

As other's said, you can get COD cheaper than that, so no need to rush to judgement.

BF runs smooth as butter on my 3.2 P4/ FX5900 OCed to 475/985 @ 1600x1200 max detail and 4x AF 😀 😛
 
Originally posted by: Amused
BF runs smooth as butter on my 3.2 P4/ FX5900 OCed to 475/985 @ 1600x1200 max detail and 4x AF 😀 😛
Same here on my 1800+ and Radeon 9700, just with 1280x960. 1600x1200 burns my retinas. 🙂

 
Back
Top