4gb of ram vs 32bit windows, is it unstable?

RedBeard

Diamond Member
Sep 29, 2000
3,403
0
76
First off I know that windows cannot address all the RAM properly.

But if a system has 4gb of ram and is running 32bit windows, have there been any reports of system instability?
 

InflatableBuddha

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2007
7,416
1
0
From what I have read, Windows 98 and ME are unstable with more than 512 MB; I haven't heard of any stability problems with 4GB in 2000/XP.
 

spyordie007

Diamond Member
May 28, 2001
6,229
0
0
200+ has no *current* stability issues running with 4GB of RAM (there have been some in the past submitted as bugs, usually related to specific applications and/or drivers).
 

Yetiman

Junior Member
Sep 9, 2007
19
0
0
I am running 4gb with XP pro and it hasn't had any issues whatsoever. I keep seeing that it will only show 3gb or less, but mine is showing 3.5gb.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
But if a system has 4gb of ram and is running 32bit windows, have there been any reports of system instability?

It shouldn't, the whole 4G limitation was put in place by MS to avoid instability caused by bad drivers.

I keep seeing that it will only show 3gb or less, but mine is showing 3.5gb.

That's because most people have no idea what they're talking about, the amount of memory seen is determined by the hardware and how much address space is stolen for the hardware.
 

Smilin

Diamond Member
Mar 4, 2002
7,357
0
0
Originally posted by: RedBeard
First off I know that windows cannot address all the RAM properly.

But if a system has 4gb of ram and is running 32bit windows, have there been any reports of system instability?

Windows can address all 4GB of ram properly. The reason you see less is a limitation of your hardware and the amount of memory it presents to the OS.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
Windows can address all 4GB of ram properly. The reason you see less is a limitation of your hardware and the amount of memory it presents to the OS.

Not true, as long as the BIOS supports remapping the lost addresses above the 4G mark it'll present the right about of memory but 32-bit Windows clients will ignore anything above the 4G mark.
 

bsobel

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Dec 9, 2001
13,346
0
0
Originally posted by: RedBeard
First off I know that windows cannot address all the RAM properly.

But if a system has 4gb of ram and is running 32bit windows, have there been any reports of system instability?

Nope. As someone else stated, the whole 4gig limit no PAE was done to deal with buggy drivers that WOULD have otherwise been a problem.
 

pallejr

Senior member
Apr 8, 2007
216
0
0
just for the argumentation, xp and vista do have a pae kernel, but still have the 4 gigabyte limit