I know this has been asked before in one way or another but I guess I need to hear it from the horses' mouths. Not that you all are a bunch of horses, hehe, I just respect what is said on these forums and I like to get feedback on a particular thing.
I am thinking of upgrading to a dual core. Reason is I do the following.....
Gaming
Video editing
quite a bit of photo processing (converting RAW to .jpg and photoshopping)
surfing
video encoding and dvd ripping
and on my current 3500+ it chugs a little and I wait for it to process while I am multitasking.
Would the 4800+ be worth the extra money or would the 4400+ be fine? Or would the 4400+ even show a noticable improvement over the 3500+ as they run at the same core speed?
Also after a few mobo's tweaking and needing replacing after running them overclocked I am shying away from overclocking so this will probably run at stock speeds....
Any suggestions? Thanks in advance!
Chris
I am thinking of upgrading to a dual core. Reason is I do the following.....
Gaming
Video editing
quite a bit of photo processing (converting RAW to .jpg and photoshopping)
surfing
video encoding and dvd ripping
and on my current 3500+ it chugs a little and I wait for it to process while I am multitasking.
Would the 4800+ be worth the extra money or would the 4400+ be fine? Or would the 4400+ even show a noticable improvement over the 3500+ as they run at the same core speed?
Also after a few mobo's tweaking and needing replacing after running them overclocked I am shying away from overclocking so this will probably run at stock speeds....
Any suggestions? Thanks in advance!
Chris