So I'm considering getting a cheap 42" LCD to replace my 27" CRT, and considering these two models.
The Westinghouse LVM-42W2 isn't available in stores as far as I can see, so I have to order from Amazon, which is a big minus. It is only around $1300 though compared to the $2000 the Sharp Aquos LC42D62U costs at Best Buy/Circuit City/ABC Warehouse. I'm sure with shipping and those 12% of coupons Best Buy sends me all the time, the price is more like $1400 compared to $1760 though.
Both TVs are 1080p 42" and have 2 component inputs as well as an S-vid. The Westinghouse has 2 DVI, 1 VGA and 1 HDMI compared to just 2 HDMI on the Sharp. I'm not sure I care about VGA or HDMI, but DVI might be a slight plus, but I think a cheap cable makes HDMI pin compatible to DVI anyway, so it doesn't really matter.
The Sharp has a built-in Tuner, which again I don't think matters a whole lot. I have Dish and need either composite or channel 73, and if I had cable, I'd have a cable box from that all the same. I'm not sure how much a tuner really adds to the cost of the TV, but that might be a big part of the difference.
What I *really* want to know though, is if either of these TVs has a much better LCD panel and much better picture quality, or if both of them are pretty poor even?
*edit* - I really like this Samsung LNS4095D too.
The Westinghouse LVM-42W2 isn't available in stores as far as I can see, so I have to order from Amazon, which is a big minus. It is only around $1300 though compared to the $2000 the Sharp Aquos LC42D62U costs at Best Buy/Circuit City/ABC Warehouse. I'm sure with shipping and those 12% of coupons Best Buy sends me all the time, the price is more like $1400 compared to $1760 though.
Both TVs are 1080p 42" and have 2 component inputs as well as an S-vid. The Westinghouse has 2 DVI, 1 VGA and 1 HDMI compared to just 2 HDMI on the Sharp. I'm not sure I care about VGA or HDMI, but DVI might be a slight plus, but I think a cheap cable makes HDMI pin compatible to DVI anyway, so it doesn't really matter.
The Sharp has a built-in Tuner, which again I don't think matters a whole lot. I have Dish and need either composite or channel 73, and if I had cable, I'd have a cable box from that all the same. I'm not sure how much a tuner really adds to the cost of the TV, but that might be a big part of the difference.
What I *really* want to know though, is if either of these TVs has a much better LCD panel and much better picture quality, or if both of them are pretty poor even?
*edit* - I really like this Samsung LNS4095D too.