DocBartend
Senior member
- Oct 22, 2001
- 366
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
So I guess my main problem is balancing cash on hand for down payment on house vs. large retirement fund. I am 24 though so that makes it a little less of a crunch.
Agreed. 27 here.
Still I'll be withdraeing 1/2 for a downplayment and it pains me to no end. It's the best option at this point though.
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
My company matches (100%) upto 6%, so I put in 6%....I wish I could afford more.
amish
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I currently contribute only 5%, but am considering bumping that up to 15%. None of that affects my empoyer contribution as they don't match, but instead make a fixed contribution to the account every year. Last year it was 11.% of my base salary.
Originally posted by: FeathersMcGraw
If you're not living paycheck to paycheck, there's very little reason not to contribute the maximum amount allowable, particularly now. Investing in a depressed market is the best risk mitigator I can think of for a successful retirement.
Originally posted by: m2kewl
6% - max company match.
you're a fool for not taking it if your company matches. most people i know thinks soc security will bail them ...buwhahaha.
Originally posted by: FeathersMcGraw
Contributions to your retirement fund are "worth more" when you're young than later in life. This is due to the effects of compounding. It's also a risk management strategy, as investment losses now can be weathered far more easily than later in your career/life.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Hector,
All the answers to your questions can be answered by your company. It all varies.
