I don't know what the religion of this Fool, Bobo, the Post Turtle, has to do with NASA or sustainable non-fossil fuels.
But, he is by muslim law a muslim. You might want to do some research.
Off Topic: Neither do I. I think he was just pointing out that since Muslim law is not codified into US law; while technically correct, you are simply using your "my I'm so amusing" posting tactic that quite frankly has gotten old. By the way, we all get it; you don't like President Obama. Repeating your same tired "Turtle" line just reinforces the idea that you're a joke. And a very bad one at that.
And you might want to do some research of your own and show where it is codified into US law that children must follow the religion of their father.
On Topic: Manned exploration is very expensive and of minimal benefit at this point for Mars, there's a lot we can learn about the moon from robots though; the Opportunity and Spirit rovers (I love those little robots!) have given us more information about Mars than we originally thought, a few more robotic missions can give us even better information for a future manned visit to Mars.
As someone else pointed out, the moons of Jupiter and Saturn that have atmospheres are great candidates for robotic missions and possibly a manned mission (although a manned would be decades away.)
Ion pulse power systems as well as nuclear seem good candidates for missions to the outer planets and their moons; we may even figure out along the way how to incorporate ion power into the energy needs for Earth and it's peoples.
Long term energy solutions should encompass all possible non-fossil fuel possibilities: I don't know the name of the technology, but they are generators that use wave motion to create electricity; Scotland has been using them for their coastal towns for a few years. Some of our coastal towns could benefit from those systems.
Hydrogen fuel cells and closed loop systems look promising as well but more research is needed for better efficiency and greater power generation.
Solar power would best be used in areas of the southwest that get a lot of sunlight: storage systems for nighttime power needs more R&D to make them practical.
Nuclear will certainly have it's place, but I think 1,000 plants is a bit extreme. We also need more R&D into fusion as opposed to fission; as well as different fuel sources. Thorium looks promising as a future source.
NASA and it's missions have shown us what we can accomplish when thinking inside and outside the box. And that is it's greatest and enduring contribution.
alzan