• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

4.5 Earthquake in Western KY

Originally posted by: notfred
4.5 is a pussy earthquake. That's like having a big truck drive past your house.

Do a little research on the New Madrid fault and get back to me. 4.5 is not much in California, but none of the buildings in the Midwest along the fault line were built to take any sort of earthquakes. Stupid? Yeah.
 
Originally posted by: X-Man
Originally posted by: notfred
4.5 is a pussy earthquake. That's like having a big truck drive past your house.

Do a little research on the New Madrid fault and get back to me. 4.5 is not much in California, but none of the buildings in the Midwest along the fault line were built to take any sort of earthquakes. Stupid? Yeah.

4.5 is weak! They are stupid a$$es if they dont prepare. Just because they are stupid and dont make buildings properly doenst make the quake any stronger.
 
still...I don't think a 4.5 does much more damage than a fart in the wind. Don't you need at least 5.0 to do some sort of damage? There was a 4.9/5.0 back east near Tennessee/Georgia a few months ago and it didn't do any damage, even though it was felt as far away as Greensboro, NC and Virginia (none of the buildings here are earthquake-proofed either.)
 
Originally posted by: Toasthead
Originally posted by: X-Man
Originally posted by: notfred
4.5 is a pussy earthquake. That's like having a big truck drive past your house.

Do a little research on the New Madrid fault and get back to me. 4.5 is not much in California, but none of the buildings in the Midwest along the fault line were built to take any sort of earthquakes. Stupid? Yeah.

4.5 is weak! They are stupid a$$es if they dont prepare. Just because they are stupid and dont make buildings properly doenst make the quake any stronger.

Because the soil in the central U.S. is looser and sandier than on the west coast, Clyburn says, ?the shockwaves from an earthquake would travel much farther and the same magnitude earthquake on the west coast would be about 10 times worse in the central U.S."
 
4.5 is weak! They are stupid a$$es if they dont prepare. Just because they are stupid and dont make buildings properly doenst make the quake any stronger.

Its enough to do DAMAGE though in structures not meant to shake. Have you seen some of the buildings in kentucky?
 
Originally posted by: uncJIGGA
still...I don't think a 4.5 does much more damage than a fart in the wind. Don't you need at least 5.0 to do some sort of damage? There was a 4.9/5.0 back east near Tennessee/Georgia a few months ago and it didn't do any damage, even though it was felt as far away as Greensboro, NC and Virginia (none of the buildings here are earthquake-proofed either.)
Richter scale measurments don't always tell the whole story. There are different "kinds" of quakes, some do more damage than others. It also depends on how far down the quake was, etc..
 
Originally posted by: uncJIGGA
still...I don't think a 4.5 does much more damage than a fart in the wind. Don't you need at least 5.0 to do some sort of damage? There was a 4.9/5.0 back east near Tennessee/Georgia a few months ago and it didn't do any damage, even though it was felt as far away as Greensboro, NC and Virginia (none of the buildings here are earthquake-proofed either.)

The damage caused by earthquakes varies. A major factor is what type of soil/bedrock the structures are built on. Also, note that the (edit: not damage, I guess it would be wave strength) caused by a 4.0 is 10x that of a 3.0.
 
Back
Top