3DMark2001 - sucks?

gtd2000

Platinum Member
Oct 22, 1999
2,731
0
76
Apart from the Matrix scenes and the coiled up "dog turd" I thought it was pretty shabby compared to the old version :(

The program seems nowhere near as well put together as the 2000 version IMHO - for example between scenes momentary flashes of desktops etc.
 

arod324

Golden Member
Jan 21, 2001
1,182
0
0
I disagree, I thought that the scenes were beautifully rendered, and that this demo is much better than 2k. Also it offered more variety. The helicopter demo was essentially the same thing 3 times in a row.
 

gtd2000

Platinum Member
Oct 22, 1999
2,731
0
76
Hmm...yes that white horse was rather asthetically pleasing......NOT :)
The carousel....mmm...
The Matrix scenes were good - but that's the best bit for me.
Did u also get the back to desktop thing too?
Compared to Vulpine is is not too bad.
 

gtd2000

Platinum Member
Oct 22, 1999
2,731
0
76
Quote from another happy viewer on another thread



<< Ran it once got 1897 ....I just pressed run at 1024x768/32 whatever the original setting was it...uninstalled,deleted. It's a great tool to get people to buy new cards I'm sure it will create tons of sales. 2000 looked a lot better outside of a few bits...un-impressed >>



my thoughts too :(
 

gtd2000

Platinum Member
Oct 22, 1999
2,731
0
76
Actually the demo is very nice now that I've seen that - but I'm not impressed with the benchmark in the least.
The &quot;Nature&quot; scene is indeed very nice :)
 

SendTrash

Platinum Member
Apr 18, 2000
2,581
0
76
&quot;The &quot;Nature&quot; scene is indeed very nice &quot;
how come I cannot run the Nature demo? I have an All In Wonder Radeon with direct x 8 in win2k
 

gtd2000

Platinum Member
Oct 22, 1999
2,731
0
76
SendTrash,
Did you just press the &quot;demo&quot; button?
Thats where the &quot;nature&quot; demo is contained - it's just the scenes with trees, grass, water etc......
Any luck?