• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

3DMark 2000 = 11,061 ; 3DMark 2001 = 8163 on a Duron oc'ed to 1287mhz w/ GF3 Ti200

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.


<< MilkPowderR,

I was talking with Mike from Madonion, he was impressed with that mad FSB overclock. it looks like you have won an award for your 3dmark scores. You can redeem it here. >>


wait a min... that's your face!! LOL.. why did you post your pic there for??!! Looks stupid.. haha.. merlocka's face.. gross! Thanks for posting your pic there to congratulate me. I mean that, LOL. 😀
 


<< hey RudeBoie,
Thanks.. I just've checked your comparison link. I see you've got a regular GF3. I think the GF3 Ti200 scores a little higher than the GF3. What video tweaking software are you using? I use NVmax.

I ran mine at default settings on the video tweaking. Did not touch the LOD setting. Left everything pretty much default. Most of the power came from the FSB of 198mhz as you saw earlier. The system memory timing is fairly aggressive as well. I optimized the BIOS setting. Video card is oc'ed to 240/540. KT333 chipset also helped me getting such score as well. >>



Actually the Ti200 at default is lower than the GF3. I've tweaked (nvmax) more for image quality (Aniso 2-Tap rather than the deault bi/tri filtering is an ex). My GF3 is clocked at 240/545. My mem runs at really high settings as well, but even when I compared 3DMarks from oc'ing bus and not oc'ing bus, I didn't see much difference, so I'm totally shocked at your awesome numbers. I assume the KT333 DDR chipset is a DDR chipset? I can imagine that running at 198 could make a huge diff. Also, XP scores tend to be lower than 98 scores too.
 
Hey milk, I'm not bored, I'm just waiting for you to see what the moderator had to say a few posts up.

-Steven
 
Ok this is getting ridiculous, you can continue flaming each other back and forth but frankly I seriously have to question the maturity of certain individuals in this thread.

MilkPowderR- Please remove the comment about SS284 from your signature.
He dislikes your thread- that's hardly a valid reason to conclude he is a troll that should never be dealt with.
I have very little doubt that the Moderators will remove the comment from your thread if you are unwilling to, so please do yourself a favor and be politic about it.
 


<< Actually the Ti200 at default is lower than the GF3. I've tweaked (nvmax) more for image quality (Aniso 2-Tap rather than the deault bi/tri filtering is an ex). My GF3 is clocked at 240/545. My mem runs at really high settings as well, but even when I compared 3DMarks from oc'ing bus and not oc'ing bus, I didn't see much difference, so I'm totally shocked at your awesome numbers. I assume the KT333 DDR chipset is a DDR chipset? I can imagine that running at 198 could make a huge diff. Also, XP scores tend to be lower than 98 scores too. >>



Yes, like I said, such high FSB and the KT333 support made my Duron system go fast.
Don't tweak it for image quality. You can't get higher score by doing that. Just run it at default. See how much score you will gain if you haven't tried it yet. 🙂
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top