- Apr 24, 2004
- 3,288
- 0
- 76
Specs:
AMD 2800+ @ 2225MHz
FSB @ 180
ATi 9800 Pro ( no overclock )
Omega Drivers ( based on ATi 4.4 CAT )
Fresh install of Windows XP Pro ( all updates )
Ran a 15200 score 2001 with only controll panel set to preformance ( all sliders left ) then tried the ATiTool ver 0.0.19 / I did not use the overclocking but I did use this tool to turn all the AA and AF to " off "
Ran 2001 again and ended up with at 17000+ score.
Ran 03 @ 5700+ score
It looks like these benches still use AA or AF in their default benchmarks. Is that true ? Is that the way thay are to be run.
Of the two 2001 scores witch on is more accurate ?
I know these benches are not a be all end all but I thought the default tests didn't use AA or AF at all.
AMD 2800+ @ 2225MHz
FSB @ 180
ATi 9800 Pro ( no overclock )
Omega Drivers ( based on ATi 4.4 CAT )
Fresh install of Windows XP Pro ( all updates )
Ran a 15200 score 2001 with only controll panel set to preformance ( all sliders left ) then tried the ATiTool ver 0.0.19 / I did not use the overclocking but I did use this tool to turn all the AA and AF to " off "
Ran 2001 again and ended up with at 17000+ score.
Ran 03 @ 5700+ score
It looks like these benches still use AA or AF in their default benchmarks. Is that true ? Is that the way thay are to be run.
Of the two 2001 scores witch on is more accurate ?
I know these benches are not a be all end all but I thought the default tests didn't use AA or AF at all.
