3dfx is dead! Sold out to Nvidia

instinky

Junior Member
Nov 2, 2000
12
0
0
3DFX Announces Three Major Initiatives to Protect
Creditors and Maximize Shareholder Value

Board of Directors Initiates Cost-Cutting Measures, Recommends to Shareholders Sale of
Company Assets to NVIDIA Corporation for $112 Million and Dissolution Of Company

SAN JOSE, Calif., Dec. 15 /PRNewswire/ -- In an effort to protect its creditors and maximize shareholder value, 3dfx Interactive,
Inc. (Nasdaq: TDFX - news) announced today that it will substantially reduce all of its workforce as part of an initiative to
significantly reduce expenses. In addition, the company said its Board of Directors will recommend to its shareholders that they
approve the sale of most of the company's assets to NVIDIA Corporation (Nasdaq: NVDA - news) as outlined in a definitive
agreement between the companies that was signed today, and also approve a plan to dissolve the company following completion of
the asset sale.

``After aggressively pursuing a wide range of options that take into consideration the interests of our creditors, our shareholders, our
employees and our customers,'' said Alex Leupp, president and CEO, 3dfx Interactive Inc., ``we strongly believe that to reduce
expenses, sell our assets and dissolve the company provides the highest return to our creditors, shareholders, and employees.''

``We expect that the combined technologies of 3dfx and NVIDIA will continue the legacy that 3dfx began in 1994,'' Leupp
continued. ``NVIDIA is the number one supplier of graphics technology to the OEM market. With the addition of 3dfx's
high-quality technology that leads the retail market, we believe the combination of the two will result in even greater PC graphics
leadership.''

The target market for 3dfx has historically been the retail graphics market, a market that 3dfx has dominated since 1998. The
segment represents approximately 10 percent of the overall graphics market, and is subject to extreme volatility and unpredictability.
Specifically, high inventory expenses, decreasing margins, and slowing demand have done irreparable harm to 3dfx. While the
company had recently announced plans to expand its business into additional markets, it has been unable to invest in its expansion
under current business and financial market conditions.

The company announced that it plans to substantially reduce its costs in order to best conserve its resources. These cost-cutting
measures include a reduction of substantially all of the company's workforce by early next year, reduction in office space, and other
efforts to reduce non-essential expenses. 3dfx is also providing manufacturing services to third parties to help cover the overhead
associated with its Juarez, Mexico manufacturing facility pending the sale of that facility. In the meantime, 3dfx expects to continue
to maintain an adequate workforce to support its customers.

The Board of Directors, with the assistance of the company's advisors, has undergone exhaustive efforts to explore many
alternatives including raising new financing to continue its operations and exploring various strategic alliances and business
combinations. It has concluded that the best interests of the creditors and shareholders will be served by selling its assets to
NVIDIA Corporation, as outlined in a definitive agreement between the companies signed today, and also to approve the plan for
dissolution. Under the terms of the agreement signed today, NVIDIA has agreed to pay a value of $112 million ($70 million cash and
one million shares of registered NVIDIA common stock as value based on NVIDIA's closing price on December 14, 2000).

Upon signing the definitive agreement, NVIDIA has agreed to loan to 3dfx $15 million for working capital, which will be credited to
the cash portion of the purchase price. In addition, 3dfx and NVIDIA have agreed to stay the patent infringement litigation between
them through closing of the transaction, at which time the suits will be jointly dismissed with prejudice. Assets included in the
transaction include all 3dfx intellectual property and chip inventory as well as certain other assets. In addition, upon signing the
definitive agreement, 3dfx transferred to NVIDIA the ``3dfx'' and ``Voodoo'' brand names and trademarks.

The closing of the transaction is subject to a variety of conditions, including 3dfx shareholder approval, receipt of governmental
approvals including the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, and receipt of all necessary consents of third
parties.

After closing the NVIDIA asset sale and upon 3dfx shareholder approval, 3dfx will proceed to pay or adequately provide for its
debts and liabilities. 3dfx will thereafter distribute its remaining assets to its shareholders in one or more distributions.

3dfx will host a conference call today at 2 p.m. Pacific Standard Time, 3 p.m. Mountain, 4 p.m. Central, 5 p.m. Eastern, to discuss
current developments and its financial results for the third quarter fiscal 2001, ended October 31, 2000. To participate in the
conference call, please dial 800-521-5428.

About 3dfx Interactive

3dfx Interactive is a global leader in enabling the emerging age of visual communications, and the 3D multimedia revolution in
personal computers and consumer products. With its patented and award-winning graphics accelerator chips, boards and software,
3dfx provides the technology to create high-impact visual experiences. The company is recognized worldwide for its ability to bring
the world's finest games, educational content, interactive entertainment and media-rich business applications to life. 3dfx products
are available in retail stores worldwide, and through leading PC makers including Compaq, Dell, Falcon Northwest and Micron. 3dfx
has headquarters in San Jose, Calif., with engineering and manufacturing facilities in Richardson, Texas, Austin, Texas, and Juarez,
Mexico. The company also operates www.3dfxgamers.com, the premier online community for Voodoo owners and gaming
enthusiasts. 3dfx Interactive is available on the Web at http://www.3dfx.com .

This notice does not constitute an offer of any securities for sale. In connection with the proposed asset sale by and between 3dfx
Interactive, Inc. (``3dfx''), NVIDIA corporation (``NVIDIA'') and NVIDIA Subsidiary (the ``Asset Sale''), 3dfx and NVIDIA plan to
file with the SEC the Proxy Statement/Prospectus of 3dfx and NVIDIA relating to the Asset Sale, as well as documents
incorporated by reference therein. You are urged to read the Proxy Statement/Prospectus when it is filed and any other relevant
documents filed with the SEC because they contain important information. You may obtain the documents free of charge at the
SEC's web site, http://www.sec.gov. In addition, documents filed by 3dfx with the SEC can be obtained by contacting 3dfx at the
following address and telephone number: Shareholder Relations, 4435 Fortran Drive, San Jose, California 95134, telephone:
408-935-4400. When it becomes available, please read the Proxy Statement/Prospectus carefully before making a decision
concerning the Asset Sale. 3dfx, its officers, directors, employees and agents may be soliciting proxies from 3dfx shareholders in
connection with the Asset Sale. Information concerning the participants in the solicitation will be set forth in the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus.

This press release contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations that are inherently subject to risks and
uncertainties. The words ``estimate,'' ``project,'' ``intend,'' ``expect,'' ``believe,'' ``plan,'' and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. The Company's actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a
number of factors, including, but not limited to, risks associated with the Company's need for additional financing and its inability to
satisfy debt obligations in the face of a potential forced bankruptcy, claims of fraudulent conveyance by the Company's creditors in
the event proceeds from the Asset Sale are insufficient to satisfy creditors, costs incurred if the Asset Sale is terminated due to a
superior proposal or the failure of the Company to obtain shareholder approval for the Asset Sale, the failure of the Asset Sale to be
consummated, the failure of estimates of net proceeds from the Asset Sale to be realized by the Company shareholders,
amendment, delay in implementation or termination of a planned Plan of Dissolution by the Company's shareholders, the liability of
Company shareholders for Company liabilities in the event contingent reserves are insufficient to satisfy such liabilities, unexpected
revenue shortfalls and quarterly variations in operating results, the recent downturn in the retail chip market and its adverse affect on
the Company's business, cost-cutting measures prompted by the need to conserve cash reserves, the need to adequately support
the retail/distributor channel, the Company's limited operating history and the inability to assess future operating results, volatility in
the Company's stock price and its effect on the ability of shareholders to sell their shares at attractive prices, the development of
new products and technologies and the effect on financial results, management of product transitions, significant customer
concentration and the potential adverse effect on the Company's financial performance of a loss of significant customers, the
absence of long-term contracts or any assurances that historical sales volumes will continue in the future, limited product diversity,
the need for developers and publishers to write software compatible with the Company's products, dependence on single-source
manufacturers and the Company's own manufacturing facility, exposure to global economic factors, foreign business practices, tax
law and currency fluctuations, the inability to protect the Company's proprietary rights, reliance on third-party licenses, potential loss
of market share, litigation expenses, the existence of a shareholder rights plan that could discourage a third party from acquiring
control of the Company, the Company's recently completed merger with GigaPixel, as well as other factors set forth in the
Company's current report on Form 10-Q for the most recently ended fiscal quarter and other reports and documents filed by
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time.

SOURCE: 3dfx Interactive, Inc.
 

Brian23

Banned
Dec 28, 1999
1,655
1
0
Too bad...... Even though I don't own a Voodoo, it's disapointing to see 3Dfx go out of business because now NVidia and ATI can charge more for their cards.
 

Killrose

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 1999
6,230
8
81
This is sad news. Now we'll have to wait for video "super chips" and pay a premium for the video products we purchase. I wonder how soon Nvida will anounce a 2year product cycle?
 

Taz4158

Banned
Oct 16, 2000
4,501
0
0


<< Too bad...... Even though I don't own a Voodoo, it's disapointing to see 3Dfx go out of business because now NVidia and ATI can charge more for their cards. >>


I agree. Even though the writing was on the wall competition is healthy.
 

Aboroth

Senior member
Feb 16, 2000
723
0
0
Well we still have Matrox. Not the fastest cards around but they are at least pretty. Don't know much about their driver quality though.
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,002
126
I'm very disappointed and saddend by this turn of events. :(
3dfx have betrayed everyone who stuck with them through their darkest days.
 

AdamK47

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,675
3,529
136
Yea, it's going to be fun watching the Voodooers react to this news.... eh, BFG10K. ;) LOL
 

Tung

Platinum Member
Nov 7, 2000
2,977
0
0
so it's true! :(
oh well, my AiW Radeon will arrive soon. ATI rules!
 

AdamK47

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,675
3,529
136
I just tried out my Radeon again today. I've been using my Voodoo 5 a lot with FSAA on. I tried 4x FSAA on the Radeon and it looked like it was turned off. After I installed about 3 different drives I realized that the Radeons FSAA just sucks and looked like the FSAA was off when in fact it was on. I put my Voodoo 5 back in after that. hehe
 

SuperGroove

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 1999
3,347
1
0
BFG10K,

Yea...they REALLY disappointed us:disgust: They put out MUCH BETTER quality drivers than did Nvidia. They have excellent support(3dfxgamers.com), unlike Nvidia, and they have always rigorously tested ALL their cards so that you don't have to worry about compatability issues, unlike Nvidia. They brought us a feature that ACTUALLY is USEFUL and immediately SUPPORTED(FSAA), unlike the super hyped up T&amp;L.

They really are a disappointing company.

Paul
-former nvidia, ati, and current 3dfx owner.
 

Tung

Platinum Member
Nov 7, 2000
2,977
0
0
i'm using the banshee right now.. i think i'll be happy with the aiw radeon when i get it. FSAA, what's that? hehe :)
 

WetWilly

Golden Member
Oct 13, 1999
1,126
0
0
AdamK47,

Ain't that the truth about FSAA? Pretty much all of the reviews have shortchanged it (which probably didn't help the V5500 any) and screenshot comparisons are pretty much useless. How does a static screenshot show how FSAA eliminates texture shimmering?

This news really sucks :(
 

Tates

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 25, 2000
9,079
10
81
Man, the money I spent on Voodoo cards over these last four years
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Hmmm....I wonder if Josh3D is gonna come back to praise &quot;his company&quot; that he &quot;works at&quot;? :)
 

RoboTECH

Platinum Member
Jun 16, 2000
2,034
0
0
what's sad is that I think a lot of the hardships endured by 3dfx and their &quot;inferior&quot; graphics cards are the results of shortsighted idiotic slams that many website review &quot;journalists&quot; have taken at them

very dark day indeed
 

rampage2001

Member
Sep 12, 2000
40
0
0
I agree robo. I think that the tide might have swung in 3dfxs favor.. for sure public opinion was moving in 3dfxs direction in recent times. Maybe that is part of the reason they sold.. they had some rump shakin drivers out that scared nvidia of a once mighty giants hibernation about to be over. 3dfx was the one company that could b*tch smack nvidia and give them a texas curb check. Nvidia knew this or they would have not bought them and their valuable information. And ATI is canadian. Boo canada, go USA. nuff said?
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,836
2,620
136
I agree it is sad news, and I think that the tide was turning for 3dfx-but with no real future products, the handwriting was on the wall.

They must have been in really desperate shape to announce this before Xmas-as it will surely have a severe dampening effect on potential sales between now and Xmas.

I was agonizing last week between a V5 5500 and a Radeon 32MB DDR-ended up ordered the Radeon because buy.com ran out of the V5. Looks like a good move now.
 

BaTTo

Member
Apr 30, 2000
40
0
0
This are sad news indeed...
When s3 dissolved I told myself &quot;wow it can happen to anybody&quot;.
But now that nVidia had their way I think we can all look foward to nVidia milking every architecture they release.
Followed by a 1 year cycle (instead of 6 months).

Hell without 3dfx I can only see ATi going back to OEM leaving hardcore gamers with only 1 option (that being nVidia) if they want the latest technology.
Matrox is in NO position to catch up to nVidia nor will they even try.

This puts gamers such as myself in a very ackward position without competition driving prices down, this scenario looks much like what would happen if AMD dissolved and Intel was left sitting pretty charging insane prices like it did back when AMD couldnt give it competition.

I would have rather seen 3dfx sold to ATi but I think that it would have been very hard for ATi to make something profitable out of 3dfx (not counting the fact that 3dfx had very exciting technologies in the works).
Also notable are the constant slams s3 and 3dfx suffered delivered by the 100's of nVida fan sites that spawned for just that purpose.

Will I ever buy a nVidia product again without feeling it helped destroy one of the companies I once held so high?
No. nVidia went from being the underdog to being the strong arm too abruptly with that lack of delivery 3dfx had.

I owned a considerable ammount of Voodoo products. I owned a Diamond Monster Voodoo1, a no name VoodooRush, A Voodoo2, A Voodoo3 then switched to TNT2 (non ultra), followed by a GeForce SDR (whose image quality is crap) and most recently an ATi All-in-Wonder Radeon.

This are Sad news indeed, no matter what you think about 3dfx they delivered the first true 3d graphichs accelerator...
 

pidge

Banned
Oct 10, 1999
1,519
0
0
The problem with 3dfx is that no matter how good their products were, they could not secure OEM deals like NVIDIA and ATI can. They may up about 90% of the market. Us gamers make up about 10% of the PC market. 3dfx can not live off a share of 10% of the market. To bad to. They were the only other company I liked. I hate ATI. I still have no respect for ATI.

3dfx revolutionized the gaming industry. I still remember my Diamond Monster and playing OpenGL Quake for the first time. Oh the memories. Things were so simple back then. Just a Matrox Millenium and a Diamond Monster and you had the best set up.
 

WetWilly

Golden Member
Oct 13, 1999
1,126
0
0
Things were so simple back then. Just a Matrox Millenium and a Diamond Monster and you had the best set up.

Ain't that the truth.
 

Draven

Member
Jan 15, 2000
102
0
0
I just got a Voodoo5, even though I knew the company was in trouble. It was a good deal, and I don't regret taking advantage of it.

But what does that mean for us Voodoo owners? Will we still get some support for our cards, or must we purchase nVidia to get any sort of updates...don't abandon us 3dfx and nVidia!

 

Tung

Platinum Member
Nov 7, 2000
2,977
0
0
Things were so simple back then. Just a Matrox Millenium and a Diamond Monster and you had the best set up.

yes, i remember those good old days :(
 

kind-of-blue

Senior member
Nov 17, 1999
256
0
0
I say, 3 cheers for the free market.

3dfX was purely a gamers card with little to justify their expense when the majority of viedo cards are bought to server a variety . Although a gamer myself, I never liked the Voodoo cards because they seemed to only offer 3d gaming solutions and completely ignored the importance of 2D in day to day operations; like web browseing.

For someone to dish out $150-$350+ for a single component that will help you frag faster is understandable. But for someone to dish out $1500-$3500 for ten of those cards say for new employees at a printing company for example, it doesn't seem to make to much sense.