3d mark 2003

[jswjimmy]

i just tested my gf4 ti4400 and i got a 1853, is that good or bad for this card,

 

[jim1976]

Not again with this...Plz
First of all always provide your system specs when you ask...
Check out Futuremark's site and compare similar systems with yours to find out.
Otherwise you can always press the search button...
Don't start a new thread for a question like this...

 

[Corporate Thug]

that score is very low, make sure AA and AF are turned off

 

[JBT]

That score is low for a TI4400?? hm I thought it was about normal.

 

[jswjimmy]

i will try it againe and overclock to then ill check back

 

[Jeff7181]

Originally posted by: shady06
that score is very low, make sure AA and AF are turned off

It's very low, but normal for a Ti4400... remember Ti4400's don't support DX9, and for the most part 3DM2k3 measures DX9 performance, even though over half (I think) of the tests don't make sure of DX9 features...

 

[jswjimmy]

i retested and i got a 1884. i guess its ok. thanks

 

[Jeff7181]

Originally posted by: jswjimmy
i retested and i got a 1884. i guess its ok. thanks

You can't expect much more from a card that's 2 years, and 2 generations old... not only that... it was a mid, maybe mid to high end card when it was new.

 

[jswjimmy]

well i have it overclocked to ti4600 wich is the top of the line gf4. 300 core 330x2 ram i could take the ram higher if i had ramsinks. ive herd of it hitting 717mhz

 

[Tab]

3dMark is a piece of shÌt anyone that uses that program shoud banned from At.

 

[Jeff7181]

Originally posted by: jswjimmy
well i have it overclocked to ti4600 wich is the top of the line gf4. 300 core 330x2 ram i could take the ram higher if i had ramsinks. ive herd of it hitting 717mhz

Doesn't matter... it simply doesn't have the power or features.