utahraptor
Golden Member
- Apr 26, 2004
- 1,053
- 199
- 106
I think the z68 should already show all the increased IPC. There may be a bit more power savings with the new chipset and the PCI 3.0 and USB 3.0 native.
I was hoping for a greater IPC increase.
Yeah there seems to be a "bulldozer" effect going on, this is about as far from "official" as you can get but it seems pretty legit.
No reason to start in with the wait for "cpu drivers" "bios updates" "micro code" "Windows Patch" "Registry Hack" ala bulldozer please.
As far as the game tests go, it's clear they're gpu bound...
This is a die shrink, to be expect - lower power, better clocks - IPC increase is a bonus.
![]()
Last gen didn't get a IPC increase from 45nm to 32nm.
This gen we're getting an IPC increase, power reduction, higher stock clocks, and presumably at this point better average overclocks. That's a petty good "Tick" for Intel.
So...exactly as predicted? A die shrink...
Not with only 1.272V, I think 1.45V-1.5V is typically necessary for 4.8GHz. IB hitting 5GHz at only 1.272V bodes well for it hitting low/mid 5GHz or maybe even higher if you feed it some more voltage. Assume these IB chips can hit 5.5GHz or so with a safe voltage. Along with the 5-10% IPC increase, in theory it should be 30-35% faster than Sandy Bridge at 4.5GHz. Far from meh IMO.SB can OC to 4.8ghz usually, whats the big deal?
If you already own a SB setup, why even upgrade. The power saving is less than 20W, not relevant.
When GPUs get a major die shrink, performance sky rockets or power use drops down majorly.. when CPUs get a major die shrink.. Completely "meh".
For all who didnt jump on the SB train, looks like a great upgrade.
This. Anyone on C2Q or older should have a great upgrade on their hands here.
