• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

32MB GF2MX pci or 16MB TNT2 agp

A

AgentW

Junior Member
First post, here goes.

I'm building a computer for my dad, I put into his older oem computer a gf2mx pci so that he could play a couple of games because it has no agp port. I've now got a spare tnt2 agp from my computers because I should be getting a better one for xmas. Now that i'm building him a new one, I'm wondering which would give him better performance. Hopefully the tnt2, I wouldn't mind swiping the gf2mx for some dual monitor action.

WT
 
The difference is between walking & cycling.

Walking = use more power & slow.
Cycling = use the same power but faster...just different method (AGP vs PCI)
 
Although you MAY want to consider an ATI Radeon PCI - as they tend to use the PCI bus more efficiently and perform quite a bit better.
Just my two bits. 😉
 


<< the gf2mx will smoke the tnt2, no contest. >>



pretty much.. I have a TNT2 Ultra 32MB in my oldest PC and it's no match for a GF2 MX....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top