$32K is top 50% income in the US

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
So I read an article of Austin TX newspaper via my smartphone and it said:

32K = top 50%
64.7K = top 25
109K = top 10
153K = top 5
388K = top 1

I thought top 50 and 25 require more money than that.
 

Vette73

Lifer
Jul 5, 2000
21,503
9
0
Factor in a lot of states 30k+ is a good income, part-time workers, senior citizens, etc.. and that brings the numbers down.

 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: Svnla
So I read an article of Austin TX newspaper via my smartphone and it said:

32K = top 50%
64.7K = top 25
109K = top 10
153K = top 5
388K = top 1

I thought top 50 and 25 require more money that that.

Median income has actually slipped over the last few years, especially after adjusting for inflation.

The top 50% pay 96.7% of all taxes and the bottom 50% pay the rest! :Q
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Factor in a lot of states 30k+ is a good income, part-time workers, senior citizens, etc.. and that brings the numbers down.

This.

So it's not low at all. Need to keep it to full time workers ONLY.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Is that the median or average?

It didn't say. This is what was in the article:

"According to the most recent analysis of IRS data .....an income of $153K would put you in the top 5 percent of taxpayers" and the rest were just what I typed earlier.
 

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,122
1,594
126
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
basically means there's a lot of poor people in the US.

This

Also, there are a lot of factors that tend to make policy makers unaware/disbelieving of the financial state of the country as a whole. Lack of travel, disregard for other cultures and, artificially inflated economies on the coasts, color the perceptions and thus actions of politicians and financial pundits.
 

Queasy

Moderator<br>Console Gaming
Aug 24, 2001
31,796
2
0
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
basically means there's a lot of poor people in the US.

Which is relative or course. $32k won't do much in NYC or LA but in small town mid-west or south, it isn't bad. And even those considered to be in poverty in the United States are still better off than just about anywhere else in the world.
 

Injury

Lifer
Jul 19, 2004
13,066
2
81
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Factor in a lot of states 30k+ is a good income, part-time workers, senior citizens, etc.. and that brings the numbers down.

Don't forget that it also factors in all of the teenagers that work only a few hours a week and people still in school that have to file taxes but don't work at all.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
I could have lived like a king on 30k in the town where I went to college... here in NJ, I don't think 30k would pay for my hole in the wall 700 sq-ft apartment.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Factor in a lot of states 30k+ is a good income, part-time workers, senior citizens, etc.. and that brings the numbers down.

Don't forget that it also factors in all of the teenagers that work only a few hours a week and people still in school that have to file taxes but don't work at all.

The wiki information posted above states for 25 year olds (and older).
 

Queasy

Moderator<br>Console Gaming
Aug 24, 2001
31,796
2
0
Originally posted by: chuckywang
economy FTL

:confused: These numbers are relatively unchanged since well before the slow-down/down-turn in the economy. What has changed is how much of the upper 50%, upper 25%, etc shoulder the income tax burden. That has actually gotten more and more progressive.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
Remember that next time you're told that only the wealthy will be taxed. :) I think sometimes the definition of 'wealthy' from a politician isn't what I'd consider 'wealthy'.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: chuckywang
economy FTL

:confused: These numbers are relatively unchanged since well before the slow-down/down-turn in the economy. What has changed is how much of the upper 50%, upper 25%, etc shoulder the income tax burden. That has actually gotten more and more progressive.

not necessarily. The share of income earned by the top 50% and particularily the top 5% and higher has increased much faster than the lower 50%, how adjusted for inflation earned about the same or less than they did a decade ago.
 

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,600
6,084
136
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Factor in a lot of states 30k+ is a good income, part-time workers, senior citizens, etc.. and that brings the numbers down.

Don't forget that it also factors in all of the teenagers that work only a few hours a week and people still in school that have to file taxes but don't work at all.

Minimum wage earners only make up a few % of the population though.

When I lived in Texas, my family made less than 30K/year (dad doing doctoral work, mother working part-time). We lived comfortably, though we did not get to save much money up.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: chuckywang
economy FTL

:confused: These numbers are relatively unchanged since well before the slow-down/down-turn in the economy. What has changed is how much of the upper 50%, upper 25%, etc shoulder the income tax burden. That has actually gotten more and more progressive.

And the top end incomes are even more progressive than the taxation.