- Feb 12, 2001
- 2,543
- 0
- 0
As a consumer, I find it absurd that AMD would release this 3200+ and stick to their September release of the Athlon 64. This really sucks. I personally always buy a cpu 2/3 of the way up the ladder. Thats where the best performance/price combo is IMHO. Now that nothing new is going to be released, the only thing to drive AMD prices down is intel releasing higher performing parts. (3.2GHz 800FSB)
From AMD's point of view, this could potentially be a smart move. Their Opteron server processor line kicks the Xeon DP's behind as well as the Itanium 2's. Because server procs generally have a higher profit margin, AMD can live off those revenues while clearing out their stock of TBred based Athlons. They can just rebadge those not so stable 3200+ to like 2400s or what not and they'll sell like hot cakes cuz they overclock well.
Summary:
From consumer point of view, lower prices doesn't make up for lack of new products.
From AMD's point of view, Opteron will feed us til Athlon 64 arrives en mass.
From AMD's point of view, this could potentially be a smart move. Their Opteron server processor line kicks the Xeon DP's behind as well as the Itanium 2's. Because server procs generally have a higher profit margin, AMD can live off those revenues while clearing out their stock of TBred based Athlons. They can just rebadge those not so stable 3200+ to like 2400s or what not and they'll sell like hot cakes cuz they overclock well.
Summary:
From consumer point of view, lower prices doesn't make up for lack of new products.
From AMD's point of view, Opteron will feed us til Athlon 64 arrives en mass.
