Originally posted by: Millenium
Song Wega 32" mine was 750 and that included the 4 years warranty from Best Buy. I get it as an open box. All it was missing was the manual.
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
I have the Samsung, and even though I do not get HDTV broadcasts:
1) I do have digital cable, and the picture quality is far superior to anything else you have listed. Sorry boys, but if your Wega is just standard NTSC, the quality is not there.
2) I do have, and you can get for a reasonable price, a progressive DVD player. 480p is much better than 480i. You cannot use the progressive feature on most "normal" quality sets, and if you could it would not be the same.
For the bux, you cant go wrong.
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Sony XBR or Hitachi Ultravision.
Originally posted by: NightFlyerGTI
Sony WEGA!! The Toshiba would be a close second, with the Samsung in 3rd. I dunno if I'd consider anything else.
Thanks. I know everything, except this.Originally posted by: N8Magic
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Sony XBR or Hitachi Ultravision.
Good thing SOMEONE else around here know their TVs.![]()
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
As for the Hitachi's
Make sure you are looking at the Ultravision line.
Originally posted by: aphexII
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
As for the Hitachi's
Make sure you are looking at the Ultravision line.
I was
Fantastic picture quality, but a very curved screen.![]()
Besides the much better price on the Hitachi, whats the main differences btwn that one and the 32" Sony HDTV?
Originally posted by: N8Magic
Originally posted by: aphexII
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
As for the Hitachi's
Make sure you are looking at the Ultravision line.
I was
Fantastic picture quality, but a very curved screen.![]()
Besides the much better price on the Hitachi, whats the main differences btwn that one and the 32" Sony HDTV?
Well, for one the Hitachi has nearly 300 lines more resolution. (800 vs. 540)
Other than that, they seem very similar. Both have line doublers built in to "boost" lower resolution signals. The Hitachi is bigger and cheaper (Sonys overpriced IMHO) and will look better.
It's all a matter of whether you can deal with a non-flat screen.![]()
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
One thing to keep in mind. Is the TV a true HDTV (built-in decoder) or is it HDTV Ready (add on decoder). There is no one agreed on standard as of yet. Myself, I am going to wait a year or two before I make the plunge. And when I do, it will (probably) be this line.
Originally posted by: aphexII
Originally posted by: N8Magic
Originally posted by: aphexII
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
As for the Hitachi's
Make sure you are looking at the Ultravision line.
I was
Fantastic picture quality, but a very curved screen.![]()
Besides the much better price on the Hitachi, whats the main differences btwn that one and the 32" Sony HDTV?
Well, for one the Hitachi has nearly 300 lines more resolution. (800 vs. 540)
Other than that, they seem very similar. Both have line doublers built in to "boost" lower resolution signals. The Hitachi is bigger and cheaper (Sonys overpriced IMHO) and will look better.
It's all a matter of whether you can deal with a non-flat screen.![]()
What kind of long term quality does hitachi offer?