• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

3000+, 3500+ or 3500+E6

sireone

Junior Member
Which one of these Venice processors will hit 2.6GHz reliably w/ Thermalright XP-90 hsf? Which one is recommended?

Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)
Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)
Athlon 64 3500+ E6 (Venice)
 
From the overclockers.com CPU database, the average overclocked speed of the Athlon 64 3200+ is 2550 Mhz (69 entries). The average overclocked speed of the Athlon 64 3500+ is 2674 Mhz (46 entries).
 
I hit 2.6 gHz on my A64 3000+ and XP-90, but I had to loosen my memory timings a bit. Running 294x9 on it, Corsair XMS memory @ ~194 (3-3-3-8) on the 133 divider. Ah well, can't complain, everything's stable as can be.

In your situation, I would go for the A64 3200, for both price-performance ratio and the 10x multiplier.
 
See my sig, i use retail cooler, right now the room temp is 35 degrees ambient and my max temp after prime for 4 hours is 51 degrees.
The 3200+ would be the best as its cheaper and it will max out at about the same speed as the 3500+.
 
Originally posted by: sireone
Besides the 1MB cache, whats the main difference between the Opteron 144 and the 3000+?

higher grade silicon=higher electrical efficiency=higher overclocks.
 
Back
Top