30 of largest U.S. Companies pay no income tax

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
If there is a flat tax, I will take the wealth I need to survive from you by force. With Herman Cain's 9 9 9 pizza deal, that comes out to a few thousand dollars. I'm sure you have that buried in your back yard in the form of gold buillion. Don't stop me from digging it up and I won't have to hurt you.

Liberals threatening violence. :biggrin:
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
You understand that the timeframe for the OP is 2008 - 2010 and for those tax years, corporations can use tax losses extending as far back as 2001

I'm not going to do the research to dig up this information

I'm not saying that this IS the reason, only that this is one possible reason.

OP's headline is false. They pay no US income tax. This is a direct result of high corporate tax rates in the US. What companies do is source out all the profits overseas and pay foreign governments all the income tax at a lower rate. It's called transfer pricing.
 

DucatiMonster696

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2009
4,269
1
71
I won't be convinced that a corporation is a citizen, until I see the state of Texas put one of them to death.

So corps shouldn't have 1st amendment rights? If so then neither should unions or private non-profits which are incorporated, etc. You can't have it both ways just because one earns profit while others are non-profit, etc.
 

jhu

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
11,918
9
81
I married a corporation consisting of three women. That's how I got around my state's polygomy laws.
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Is there a different tax rate for an s-corp than other types of corporations? Because I operate an s-corp and the federal tax rate is 0.
 

Generator

Senior member
Mar 4, 2005
793
0
0
Taxes are the poor people's burden. What we are all witness to is a collapse of a country. The military, food stamps, entitlements, crony capitalism is all paid with debt and money printing.
 

a777pilot

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2011
4,261
21
81
Income/profit from any source along with private real property ought not be taxed at all.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,745
4,563
136
So this is why the lobbyists are in Washington insisting their corporations are taxed too high.

It's not enough many of them are paying nothing to the IRS. No, the want the IRS to pay THEM money now.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
13
81
So corps shouldn't have 1st amendment rights? If so then neither should unions or private non-profits which are incorporated, etc. You can't have it both ways just because one earns profit while others are non-profit, etc.

Sure, just like there are limits on free speech for an individual, buying the government should be considered out of bounds for a corporation.
 

DucatiMonster696

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2009
4,269
1
71
Sure, just like there are limits on free speech for an individual, buying the government should be considered out of bounds for a corporation.

Then you need to apply that view to all private organizations....ACLU, Moveon.org, NAACP, SEUI, etc and also stifle their 1st amendment rights. However the USSC reasonably disagrees with and realizes is irrational and not the intent or right of government in regards to private entities which are a collection of individuals or in some cases a single individual (e.g. a person who does private contracting and is incorporated ).
 
Last edited:

MagickMan

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2008
7,460
3
76
Full of fail.

A) OP premise is wrong. If OP paid no taxes he would not have his ass thrown in prison so long as he owed no taxes. It's quite easy for a company to owe no taxes, regardless of "profit".
B) GAAP profit is not the same as Federal Taxable income.
C) The tax law is what it is. Don't blame the companies for following the law, blame Congress for kowtowing and changing the law.
D) According to the article, PG&E paid no income tax. Yet I can look at their annual statement for 2010 and see that they've paid $1.5 billion in income taxes in 2008, 2009, and 2010. The 2010 effective tax rate was 33.9%.
E) According to the article, GE paid no income tax. Yet I can look at their annual statement for 2010 and see that they've paid $1 billion in income taxes in 2008, 2009, and 2010.

And so on.

So, the article is crap? Color me surprised. :eek:
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Dave, they pay no tax so that they can pay more dividends to the shareholder so that THEY can pay more tax. ():) I think it would be ok for there to be a flat tax on Corporations of say 15% and that they have to distribute as dividends at least 40% of their net income and pay a tax penalty for not using their R/E as US Job or US Capital investment.

Or some such...