Originally posted by: Duvie
I say get #1 and oc it to near 3ghz which you wont get near with the 2100+xp...trust me!!!
Jeeeeezzzz! What a reaction, what gives?
I simply asked a question. You said near 3GHz. Here is a link showing the average overclocked speed of a 2100+ t-bred at 2318MHz, and this includes the first batches.
link So like I said, most of the newer ones are hitting 2400MHz.
Originally posted by: Duvie
I see some 2400mhz and some 2300mhz...either way you look at it they are non barton chips so at 2400mhz that would be using the old amd pr rating (non barton) would be equivalent to 3000+ xp
I don't get it, you just contradicted yourself! List time I checked a 3000+ was at least equal to a 3.0GHz P4. (an overclocked 2.4 won't have hyperthreading)
Now it might be true that the 2.4 usually does better than
near 3GHz, but that's not what you said.
Originally posted by: Duvie
Now toss in the fact quite a few are running DCDDR mobos and smoking 33%+ over the top of pc1066 numbers in bandwidth and running 720+fsb like me and distance grows....
He's talking about an Nforce2 motherboard. CPU and motherboard would be well within his $200 budget. I dare say that an Nforce2 motherboard running 400MHz DDR is a more than worthy platform.
No need to get all defensive and p!ssed off.
I guess maybe I should mention some of the results people are getting with the newer 1700+ 309 cpu.
I don't have anything against Intel. I just don't like the fact that there isn't a lower clocked P4 you can buy for $50-$90 and overclock to much higher speeds. If the 2.4GHz P4 was $90 like the 2100+ t-bred, I would certainly buy one. I also don't like the fact that the Intel .13 micron die is so fragile to extra voltage. I think it has been long enough to safely assume the AMD .13 micron die is much more robust.
Duvie, you have a very nice P4 overclock and I respect the fact that you like Intel. I prefer AMD, I am not trying to make any enemies here. I really think you are overreacting big time, I apologize if my question offended you.