Is there a concrete number we can look at? Some articles I am finding are saying that android is already dominant with 50% of the market.
http://www.thetechherald.com/articl...oid-now-on-almost-half-of-world-s-smartphones
Agreed that is the case today. The question is at what level does the sheer marketshare of Android force it to be the primary platform? When its half the smartphone market? When its 70% of the smartphone market?
http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_new...lcome-to-the-united-states-of-android-and-ios
It's almost like a political campaign map.
I think it's a question of whether Android's overall marketshare (in more than just the phone market) will reach a comfortable point for it to be considered a primary platform. Right now, it only holds the most significant share in smartphones and not elsewhere. And it's very unlikely, as I have noted, that smartphone marketshare for Android will ever grow to a much larger number than today due to influence from big guys such as RIM, MS, HP, and Nokia.
Smartphones will be the major platform in 18 months. The market will be flooded with low-cost options and the only people buying dumbphones will be holdouts who choose against having one.And as stated... it's still about smartphone, but smartphone is not the only platform in existence, nor is it the most major one.
I'm not sure I would call MS or HP big guys when they both have marketshares that are barely more than a rounding error.
Smartphones will be the major platform in 18 months. The market will be flooded with low-cost options and the only people buying dumbphones will be holdouts who choose against having one.
Plans are getting cheap as well; Virgin Mobile is $35/mo for unlimited data, and Straight Talk (Tracfone) is $45/mo for unlimited everything.
Worldwide, pre-paid subscribers are 72% of the market. The Virgin Mobiles and Page Pluses of the world command the lions share of customers.Virgin Mobile and Straight Talk are barely known. I'm sure you'll find significantly more AT&T and Verizon subscribers in the US. They are more the exception than the norm, or at least that's how I see it.
Regarding low-cost smartphone options, well... I don't see them in terms of hardware. Everyone and his kid brother is gearing up for more tablets and quad-core phones next year rather than making a $100 Android 2.2 device. The only ones who care enough to make those are in China, half the globe away.
Since there are many Android phones, and only the iPhone and iPad with iOS, is it fair competition?
It's not strictly platform against platform, since Apple has to contend with the marketing effort of both Google (in OS terms) and HTC, Samsung, Motorola, etc. in handset terms.
Since there are many Android phones, and only the iPhone and iPad with iOS, is it fair competition?
It's not strictly platform against platform, since Apple has to contend with the marketing effort of both Google (in OS terms) and HTC, Samsung, Motorola, etc. in handset terms.
Bragging rights... but really, its important because of app developers want to develop for the largest user base.And why is marketshare so important ???
So you have no voice plan?Got an Android phone, Optimus V this past quarter on $25/month unlimited data plan.
What can I say. It's been pretty good.
I am sure iPhone4 is better, but it would cost 3x more over 2 years and it would not deliver 3x more value to me.
So you have no voice plan?
It's not like they've only had one phone out at a time, different colors, sizes and older models. You have to compare platform to platform because even Apple has always had more than one phone on sale at one time, except of course the beginning.
So you have no voice plan?