2nd real estate shoot

Maximus96

Diamond Member
Nov 9, 2000
5,388
1
0
Went to my 2nd real estate shoot a week ago. Below are some of the pics. It’s a small house, about 1000 SF selling for around $340K

1235775340_JkBZr-L-5.jpg


1235936364_RkDLT-L-3.jpg


1235773782_UMeTy-L-1.jpg


1235775539_7hNXn-L-1.jpg


1235774981_xUeLE-L-3.jpg


I also shot my 3rd, 4th, and 5th house over this past weekend. I’ll share those once I get through with the photos.

Comments appreciated.
 

dougp

Diamond Member
May 3, 2002
7,909
4
0
The natural lighting inside that house is spectacular, or you have some good wireless flash. Does the 7D have on-camera HDR? I'd love to see your pre-processing photos.

The last photo does look WAY over-processed though, or way too saturated, when compared with the others. Compare the sky colors from the first and last photos.
 

Maximus96

Diamond Member
Nov 9, 2000
5,388
1
0
i agree with the last shot, now that you mentioned it. i'll take a look when i get home. both skies are faked in though.

i shot these with the 5d because 17mm is not wide enough on the 7d. i've been contemplating trading the 17-40mm with a 10-22mm. i plan to shoot videos soon and with the 10-22 i don't have to bring two bodies with me...
 

nboy22

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2002
3,304
1
81
Very nice shots, love it. I do agree with the last photo but it's still nice.

What mm were you on with your lens? Did you do HDR with multiple pictures/exposures or did you do the HDR with photoshop and RAW files? I think I heard recently you only need to take one RAW image to do an HDR image on the Canons.

if you don't mind me asking, how much did you get paid for doing these shots? Or was it unpaid/practice? I am thinking about getting into weddings and real estate.
 

Krioni

Golden Member
Feb 4, 2000
1,371
0
71
Agree with other posts... i'm surprised you did HDR for real estate photos... Hope that either you're very quick with post processing, or they paid you well for your time!
 

nboy22

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2002
3,304
1
81
I just noticed on the second to last photo, there is that green plant sitting on top of the shelves. The green plant is really blown out, due to the HDR I think.
 

dougp

Diamond Member
May 3, 2002
7,909
4
0
Agree with other posts... i'm surprised you did HDR for real estate photos... Hope that either you're very quick with post processing, or they paid you well for your time!

I see HDR used on a LOT of real estate photos with high end houses - they tend to have a lot more windows, or open space where it really benefits from it. Take a look at FBB's real estate photos and he does the same thing.

I'd still like to see the pre-processing photos if we could! I'm always interested in what's done during the processing process. Hah.
 

Maximus96

Diamond Member
Nov 9, 2000
5,388
1
0
I just noticed on the second to last photo, there is that green plant sitting on top of the shelves. The green plant is really blown out, due to the HDR I think.

you're right, the greens are blown there. i'll see what i can do.

i'll throw up a standard exposure tonight as well.
 

Krioni

Golden Member
Feb 4, 2000
1,371
0
71
Another thing I noticed... $340K for 1000SF house... Ouch!

I know that is probably the norm wherever you are, but holy smokes... I could get a nice 3000SF or more house for that in my area.
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
Another thing I noticed... $340K for 1000SF house... Ouch!

I know that is probably the norm wherever you are, but holy smokes... I could get a nice 3000SF or more house for that in my area.

thats nothing lol. we bought our 1200 sqft house for $375k 15 years ago or so... :D

a few years ago i saw a nearby house going for 900k... 2 BR
 

nboy22

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2002
3,304
1
81
thats nothing lol. we bought our 1200 sqft house for $375k 15 years ago or so... :D

a few years ago i saw a nearby house going for 900k... 2 BR

I grew up in Idaho and the price difference is disgusting. My friend's step dad just built a house a few years ago. $800,000 bought him a 9,000 Sq. ft house on what is probably 2-4 acres of land. Wyoming is probably even cheaper.
 

Dubb

Platinum Member
Mar 25, 2003
2,495
0
0
there's too much midtone in all shots (counters, floor, etc look dirty when they aren't). That combined with the over saturation and WB issues (cool daylight vs warm interior light) makes them feel very strange to me.

Look into blending by hand rather than using an HDR plugin. Plugins tend to muck up the midtones.

On the lighting issues: on bright days I usually turn the lights off and just stick a wirelessly controlled flash w/ sphere diffuser in the fixtures I want to light. Color temp for flash is much closer to daylight and I can gel if I need to. You can also swap bulbs for daylight bulbs but that doesn't always work well. With flashes I can pump out more light and with a couple fills there's often no need for HDR.
 

Maximus96

Diamond Member
Nov 9, 2000
5,388
1
0
thanks for the tips! i'll keep that in mind for the next shoot. i find that i don't really have that much time to set up the lights properly on site tho. that's why i rely on exposure blending. i brought with me 4 speedlights and 2 stands with umbrellas but did not have time to set up and tinker with settings.
 

Dubb

Platinum Member
Mar 25, 2003
2,495
0
0
thanks for the tips! i'll keep that in mind for the next shoot. i find that i don't really have that much time to set up the lights properly on site tho. that's why i rely on exposure blending. i brought with me 4 speedlights and 2 stands with umbrellas but did not have time to set up and tinker with settings.

On HDR, Hogan phrased it very well recently in his D5100 commentary:

I've never understood this "you need lots of overlapping images to do HDR" thing that is being promoted by what now seems like everyone under the sun. What happens is you end up with a lot of the same data that has to then be curved against each other. The D5100 does two-shot HDR (up to three stops apart), which is exactly what I do in the field. Shoot for the highlights, shoot for the shadows, you've got enough overlapping data in the middle. If you need more than three stops on top of the eight or nine real stops the camera can give you, you've got a different problem: you're so outside the DR that can be put on paper or on a screen that you've just made your curving of the data a really big pain to get right. Two exposures should be all you need to establish the toe and the shoulder data, and give you enough overlap in the middle ramp to use for your mid-tone blending.

As far as lighting quickly goes, I sometimes do the multilight trick with flashes (also handy if you only have one or two flashes you can wirelessly control):

shot1: expose for ambient (windows)
shot2: flash in location 1, full power or close, exposed for flash
shot3: flash in location 2, full power or close, exposed for flash
.... as many as needed, including several options for fill

This is quick - snap - move flash -snap etc.

Blend by hand in photoshop, usually as simple as varying layer opacity.

and bingo, you can adjust all your lighting levels quickly after the fact. you can't adjust the nature of the light though, so it's useful to think about that as you go (snoot, diffuser, etc).
 

LanceUEP

Junior Member
You might also want to look at blending a flash layer on top of the exposure fusion layer. I've been starting to do this and it works really great. Take your normal exposures, then set up flashes to over-power the ambient. It doesn't need to be perfect, you just need a generally decent exposure. This will result in a photo that has the correct colors in it.

Pull the exposure fusion image into photoshop and drop the flash image on top. Set the flash layer to Color blending mode, then lower the opacity down to 75-80%. I've noticed this greatly improves the color of the photos, especially correcting color cast issues. You have a lot of blue casting going on and it should be removed using this method, and doesn't take too much additional time.

Example:

Enfused Image

001.jpg



Flash Image layered on top in Color mode

002.jpg



You'll notice differences in the dining table/chairs (no blue cast), back of big sofa chair (no blue cast), top of end table (no blue cast), floor (more accurate color) and the wall between the two windows (no gold cast).

Give it a shot sometime, see if it is beneficial to you.
 

Maximus96

Diamond Member
Nov 9, 2000
5,388
1
0
thanks for this tip! I just read a similar post elsewhere. I have a shoot coming up tomorrow and on saturday. i'll definitely try this out.