there's just as much "crap" from W8 supporters.
Like somebody keeps mentioning dos 6.22..
Which has nothing to do with W8. btw, some of us started using computers before dos 6.22.
I started using Fortran and stacks of punch cards on the main frame at Ohio State. 1974.
Does that validate my opininion that W8 should have easy options to default to the desktop ui, no hidden features option, a W7 Start menu ?
I have nothing against the new features of the ui, the problem has to do with FORCING adoption of certain designs that don't make sense for everyone.
I have heard so far "too complicated" then "too simple",then its "for older people" then young,"you need a touchscreen" etc....over 90% of it is crap,its like the anti-8 posters want to post any crap because then have nothing better to do,my point about DOS 6.22 if you can understand, was I adjusted to every OS Microsoft made after,ie from DOS to Windows then virtually every release,I also adjusted to Linux,when I was at school we did not have computers etc so everything I picked up was the hard way if you get my meaning,now Win8 is not hard to learn.
I can understand people not liking the look of UI etc since that's really a preference thing but end of the day there is nothing really wrong with Win8,if you don't like it fine why post crap about it,it serves no purpose unless you can make a constructive post about it(even if its negative),rather then the vague and FUD comments I've heard from most anti-8 posters.
Even some members have posted crap about it without even trying it,now that says it all.
Ironically this seems to happen everytime Microsoft release a new OS,wonder what crap I will hear on Win9.
As for forcing you,you've Linux you have older Windows operating systems,nobody is forcing you,you can always wait for Win9 ,10 etc...especially if Microsoft go on a yearly change.
Btw I was using computer before DOS as well,ie Sinclair ZX81,then Commodore 64,Amiga etc...can't get much older then that,guess we are old timers

.