2nd Amendment rights?

[GoofyGoofT]

[FONT=&quot]I was wondering if the people on this forum are pro 2nd Amendment rights?

Also do you think it is right for people to openly carry a gun in public? As long as they are abiding by all the laws?[/FONT]

 

[JS80]

lol welcome to P&N

wait a sec this is OT!!

 

[frostedflakes]

↓ p&n

 

[theflyingpig]

Some people here support the rights this nation was built upon, others feel the need to persecute those who enjoy the freedoms given to us by the founding fathers. Everyone knows this.

 

[techs]

The problem is that the writers of the Constitution knew this as a gun:

And had no idea this would turn out to be a gun:

 

[Locut0s]

Posting in an ATOT gun thread!

 

[Red Squirrel]

Guns are from the devil. And so is foosball.

 

[Proprioceptive]

I'm certainly pro 2nd amendment, but I do believe there should be a limit to "open" carry. I mean, at some point people who are already unnecessarily paranoid become more... well... liberal?

 

[Matthiasa]

To be fair the 2nd amendment mentions "Militia" not ordinary citizens.
That said I'm for ordinary individuals right to own gun... assuming that can pass some test showing they aren't idiots, and that they aren't violent criminals.

 

[Proprioceptive]

The problem is that the writers of the Constitution knew this as a gun:

And had no idea this would turn out to be a gun:

Wow, you're stupid.

Oh yeah, I just did that.

 

[spidey07]

Shall not be infringed. Open carry is fine and encouraged.

 

[Matthiasa]

Shall not be infringed. Open carry is fine and encouraged.

Militia... if you're going to quote it at least know that is stated for militia.

 

[Proprioceptive]

To be fair the 2nd amendment mentions "Militia" not ordinary citizens.
That said I'm for ordinary individuals right to own gun... assuming that can pass some test showing they aren't idiots, and that they aren't violent criminals.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

You need to learn how to read.

 

[spidey07]

Militia... if you're going to quote it at least know that is stated for militia.

Supreme court consistently disagrees with your assertion.

 

[Matthiasa]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

You need to learn how to read.

Naw, it's how it's stated those people are to be part of the militia.

 

[Double Trouble]

Militia... if you're going to quote it at least know that is stated for militia.

The supreme court already resolved that question. The second amendment applies to individual citizens.

 

[Proprioceptive]

Naw, it's how it's stated those people are to be part of the militia.

 

[nick1985]

Naw, it's how it's stated those people are to be part of the militia.

Good thing the Supreme Court disagrees with you.


Right?

 

[GoofyGoofT]

It should be legal to open carry in every state I can't believe that Texas is not open carry, and places in CA with under 200,000 people it is legal to open carry (without the gun being loaded) that is the dumbest thing to not be able to open carry loaded we should be able to open carry with a bullet in the chamber.

Glock 19

 

[nick1985]

Thats a long sentence brah

 

[Proprioceptive]

Good thing the Supreme Court disagrees with you.


Right?

Yeah, unlike Matthiasa, the justices got where they are by learning basic grammar in primary school...

 

[Matthiasa]

Learn to read much... I already said I'm for people owning guns as long as their not idiots or violent criminals...

I'm only stating that that with how it was written it implies that those people were to be part of the militia, as thus able to be called on in time of war.

 

[nick1985]

I'm only stating that that with how it was written it implies that those people were to be part of the militia, as thus able to be called on in time of war.

No, it does not. The Supreme Court also says it does not.

 

[Proprioceptive]

Learn to read much... I already said I'm for people owning guns as long as their not idiots or violent criminals...

I'm only stating that that with how it was written it implies that those people were to be part of the militia, as thus able to be called on in time of war.

:facepalm:

I guess you shouldn't own a gun since you're an idiot. :awe:

 

[nick1985]

A well regulated Windmill association, being necessary to the security of a cheap power, the right of the people to keep and bear windmills, shall not be infringed.


Does this statement state that individuals must be part of a windmill association in order to own a windmill? I await your reply