- Mar 20, 2000
- 102,414
- 8,356
- 126
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt Oh, you're one minute too late.
ZV
and i'm speeling wrong!
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt Oh, you're one minute too late.
ZV
Originally posted by: shabby
Holy torque batman!
Why doesnt honda just slap on a turbo and be done with it? Every one wants one, so why not give it to them?
A srt4 neon makes more torque at 2500rpm then a s2000 could ever dream to make. And it does it through out the whole power band, not just near the redline.
Please just stop. The SRT4 and the S2000 are in no way comparible.Originally posted by: shabby
Holy torque batman!
Why doesnt honda just slap on a turbo and be done with it? Every one wants one, so why not give it to them?
A srt4 neon makes more torque at 2500rpm then a s2000 could ever dream to make. And it does it through out the whole power band, not just near the redline.
Still, a turbo wouldn't be bad at all. There are a few turbo kits on the market already.Originally posted by: tweakmm
Please just stop. The SRT4 and the S2000 are in no way comparible.Originally posted by: shabby
Holy torque batman!
Why doesnt honda just slap on a turbo and be done with it? Every one wants one, so why not give it to them?
A srt4 neon makes more torque at 2500rpm then a s2000 could ever dream to make. And it does it through out the whole power band, not just near the redline.
Originally posted by: Howard
Still, a turbo wouldn't be bad at all. There are a few turbo kits on the market already.Originally posted by: tweakmm
Please just stop. The SRT4 and the S2000 are in no way comparible.Originally posted by: shabby
Holy torque batman!
Why doesnt honda just slap on a turbo and be done with it? Every one wants one, so why not give it to them?
A srt4 neon makes more torque at 2500rpm then a s2000 could ever dream to make. And it does it through out the whole power band, not just near the redline.
Originally posted by: OrganizedChaos
whats up with the torque?
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: shabby
Holy torque batman!
Why doesnt honda just slap on a turbo and be done with it? Every one wants one, so why not give it to them?
A srt4 neon makes more torque at 2500rpm then a s2000 could ever dream to make. And it does it through out the whole power band, not just near the redline.
True, but one's a Neon, and the other's a chick-magnet.
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: Howard
Still, a turbo wouldn't be bad at all. There are a few turbo kits on the market already.Originally posted by: tweakmm
Please just stop. The SRT4 and the S2000 are in no way comparible.Originally posted by: shabby
Holy torque batman!
Why doesnt honda just slap on a turbo and be done with it? Every one wants one, so why not give it to them?
A srt4 neon makes more torque at 2500rpm then a s2000 could ever dream to make. And it does it through out the whole power band, not just near the redline.
High compression ratio + boost = BOOM!
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Which is why most of the S2K turbo setups only run a piddling 7psi of boost.
- M4H
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Which is why most of the S2K turbo setups only run a piddling 7psi of boost.
- M4H
Just like every other Honda turbo setup out there. I'd still drive one though
Originally posted by: freebee
S2000 wont have a turbo, even the NSX is a NA engine. It has to do with the performance characteristics that Honda wants in their vehicles. Also, notice that even Ferraris (with the exception of a few) are all NA engines. You can't make that kinda of engine music while muted by a turbo.
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: freebee
S2000 wont have a turbo, even the NSX is a NA engine. It has to do with the performance characteristics that Honda wants in their vehicles. Also, notice that even Ferraris (with the exception of a few) are all NA engines. You can't make that kinda of engine music while muted by a turbo.
Bah! I'll take a nice big turbo over an NA engine ANY day of the week. me = DSMer I luv the whine of a nice turbo
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
hehe, don't you just love the potential of the 4G63? DSM POWAH!
Originally posted by: boyRacer
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
hehe, don't you just love the potential of the 4G63? DSM POWAH!
No.
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Which is why most of the S2K turbo setups only run a piddling 7psi of boost.
- M4H
Just like every other Honda turbo setup out there. I'd still drive one though
Hell yes. Like you said, one's a Neon, the other's a chick magnet.
And I bet the SRT4 makes up the price difference in its repair bill over five years.
- M4H
hehe, don't you just love the potential of the 4G63? DSM POWAH!
Originally posted by: freebee
The SRT4 is faster than an s2k. And I agree, a turbo can do wonders to even an ordinary car.
I'm not exactly sure the s2k is a chick magnet. Its a small Japanese convertible, kinda like a Miata or Del Sol with a bit more engine power. Seems kinda fruity. Which is why I'm somewhat puzzled by the superior attitudes of the s2k owners over at s2ki (which I read frequently). Nonetheless I still wanna get one...(recall my thread about my helmet purchase a few weeks ago).
Originally posted by: shabby
hehe, don't you just love the potential of the 4G63? DSM POWAH!
Sure do, but what about a long rod 4G64?
Originally posted by: shabby
I've seen some people run 3psi with a turbo kit.... yes 3psi hahahah.
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: shabby
I've seen some people run 3psi with a turbo kit.... yes 3psi hahahah.
Hell, at 3psi my 93 Civic can be mAd tUrB03d y0! No electric BOV for me!
- M4H