2GB vs 4GB

Oct 9, 1999
19,632
38
91
I'm about to pick up a BIOSTAR NF4UAM2G open-box off of Newegg and had a question. Dual-channel works with 2GB and 4GB right? I know when I used two different branded sticks in my old 939 board it didn't run dual channel.

I'm planning on getting the super-talent(4x1GB) to run in the motherboard.
 

norton44

Junior Member
Sep 11, 2007
5
0
0
First of all what operating system are you planning to use?

I'd go with Vista 64 as it will take advantage of all 4GB.
 
Oct 9, 1999
19,632
38
91
Originally posted by: norton44
First of all what operating system are you planning to use?

I'd go with Vista 64 as it will take advantage of all 4GB.

xp. i'll eventually move to vista by the end of the year or so. don't have the money to buy a new operating system.

maybe i should stick with 2GB and grab the other 2GB when i install vista?
 

covert24

Golden Member
Feb 24, 2006
1,809
1
76
if you were to get 4 gb id got with 2gb x2. its more of a possibility that the mobo will experience problems with all 4 slots filled. id go with the 4gb now since it can never hurt to have more ram.
 

covert24

Golden Member
Feb 24, 2006
1,809
1
76
yea 2gb is more than enough but if i had the option to either get 2 or 4gb id def go with the 4. it really depends on what your going to be doing and your budget.
 

StriperMike

Member
Sep 2, 2007
96
0
66
If you are going to be running XP for a while Id stick with 2GB. Once you move to Vista Id upgrade to 4gb if you see the need. Memory prices might drop a little by then and youll save yourself some $$$.
 

kukito

Junior Member
Sep 11, 2007
1
0
0
Consider also that memory prices are very low now. Get as much as you can afford. Even though 32 bit Windows won't recognize much more than 3 GB as soon as you upgrade to 64 bit that memory will become available.
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
Originally posted by: kukito
Consider also that memory prices are very low now. Get as much as you can afford. Even though 32 bit Windows won't recognize much more than 3 GB as soon as you upgrade to 64 bit that memory will become available.
Ditto. I just ordered 2x2GB, and have yet to have a mobo to install it in (I've been on the wrong side of "price corrections" before!). I plan to use some Linux(es) in x8-64, though...

How much do you use now? Do you feel constrained? Are you going wit Vista?

The short answers:
If 1GB is fine now, 2 will do. If 1GB isn't enough, go ahead and get 4, because applications tend to get bigger, or at least their data does. If you're going with Vista, add 1GB to whatever you need with XP.

More later: the problem is that many boards flat out won't handle all 4 sticks, and many others won't use them all at full speed (yes, even though it's the CPU that's doing the driving). Mixing RAM of different makes and models only adds another variable, and one that will more likely be bad than good. could get 4GB over again, replacing your "older" 2GB, but then there's 2 useless DIMMs, and extra cost. Historically, RAM is very cheap right now, most especially DDR2 667 and 800.

Longer answers:
Vista (my experience is Business on an Athlon XP): the more the better. 1GB is a realistic minimum, 2GB for anyone who multitasks, and more if you're not gaming. With a bit more than you'd need for XP, it is indeed more responsive, and far less prone to HDD thrashing causing problems. Even though you can't use all 4GB, 3-3.5GB ought to be OK, even though you paid for 4. Take what you can get and figure it'll come in handy when you can safely go 64-bit.

Gaming on Vista 32-bit: more video memory means more address space used up, so you can end up with not 3-3.5GB out of 4GB, but even as far down as 2GB. Some people who got those 320MB and 640MB SLI rigs got burned. XP at least lets you try PAE, though there's no guarantee that everything will right work right with it (I've not used PAE with enough RAM to really need it, so can't say by first-hand experience how good/bad everything works). Keep your video card's RAM in mind as you upgrade.

Anything x64: if you have lots running at any time, go for more. I can push my 1.5GB w/ web browsers, because I never completely shut them off (session saving rocks...and makes it easy to eat RAM!). More RAM means more stuff can sit behind your game or whatever else, yet still be somewhat responsive when you're done. Both Vista and Linux will do a good job of using it up for file caching; so things should be better after the machine has been on for a few days, even if you're not eating the RAM up with apps and their data.
 

biochip

Junior Member
Sep 12, 2007
2
0
0
I think the question should be will 4 dimms run at 1T on a dual channel motherboard as you can never have enough RAM especially if you are running windows vista.

I currently have 2x 1gig dimms and want to add another 2x 1gigs to bump my memory up to 4gig. I have an nforce 4 chip set. But my question also applies all nforce chip sets and intel chipsets that run dual channel.
 
Oct 9, 1999
19,632
38
91
Originally posted by: biochip
I think the question should be will 4 dimms run at 1T on a dual channel motherboard as you can never have enough RAM especially if you are running windows vista.

I currently have 2x 1gig dimms and want to add another 2x 1gigs to bump my memory up to 4gig. I have an nforce 4 chip set. But my question also applies all nforce chip sets and intel chipsets that run dual channel.



Yeah, that's what I've had problems with in the past while trying to run 4 sticks.

Can anyone explain?

welcome to the forums bio!