Okay, so I just built my rig with the memory listed in my sig - basically the bottom of the Corsair XMS bin. I haven't even bothered pushing it past 210, knowing it won't get anywhere near the 255 HTT I'm running my Opty at. So all of a month after the new build, I want faster and bigger 1GB sticks. Choices are:
OCZ EL Gold Gamer Ext. XTC (OCZ5002048ELGEGXT-K)
DDR500
CL3-4-3-8
$210
Mushkin XP (991483) - Black
DDR500
3-4-3-8
$185 (@ ZZF AR once in stock)
or, should I feel generous-
OCZ PC4000 Platinum EB
DDR500
3-3-2-8
~$307 (@ Newegg, purcahsed as individual sticks)
Mushkin PC4000 Redline
DDR500
3-3-2-8
$320 (out of stock @ ZZF)
Obviously we're talking about two different price points, and 2 different "classes" of memory chip - the ~$200 sticks use UCCC, the more expensive sticks use Infineon C. My concern is that the I may get some of the UCCC-based RAM with a lower maximum overclock; it seems to be very week-dependant, with some sites getting 280+, some topping out at 255. BUT, am I really getting that much better performance from the $100+ difference to justify the Redlines or OCZ EB? I know I'll be guranteed the higher speed, and at lower timings, but I can't help but think that $100 could be spent elsewhere.
I just hate gambling with what week UCCC I'm going to get. For the same money, G.Skill and Corsair also sell sticks using these ICs. From what I've read, they aren't manufactured to be DDR500, they just test and bin the best DDR400 UCCC chips and sell then as 250Mhz sticks. Thus the low overclock potential.
Also, am I taking any risks getting the EB sticks in seperate packages? What are the chances I get 2 sticks that can't run well together? Any reason I should hold out for the Redlines?
TIA
OCZ EL Gold Gamer Ext. XTC (OCZ5002048ELGEGXT-K)
DDR500
CL3-4-3-8
$210
Mushkin XP (991483) - Black
DDR500
3-4-3-8
$185 (@ ZZF AR once in stock)
or, should I feel generous-
OCZ PC4000 Platinum EB
DDR500
3-3-2-8
~$307 (@ Newegg, purcahsed as individual sticks)
Mushkin PC4000 Redline
DDR500
3-3-2-8
$320 (out of stock @ ZZF)
Obviously we're talking about two different price points, and 2 different "classes" of memory chip - the ~$200 sticks use UCCC, the more expensive sticks use Infineon C. My concern is that the I may get some of the UCCC-based RAM with a lower maximum overclock; it seems to be very week-dependant, with some sites getting 280+, some topping out at 255. BUT, am I really getting that much better performance from the $100+ difference to justify the Redlines or OCZ EB? I know I'll be guranteed the higher speed, and at lower timings, but I can't help but think that $100 could be spent elsewhere.
I just hate gambling with what week UCCC I'm going to get. For the same money, G.Skill and Corsair also sell sticks using these ICs. From what I've read, they aren't manufactured to be DDR500, they just test and bin the best DDR400 UCCC chips and sell then as 250Mhz sticks. Thus the low overclock potential.
Also, am I taking any risks getting the EB sticks in seperate packages? What are the chances I get 2 sticks that can't run well together? Any reason I should hold out for the Redlines?
TIA
