• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

2D quality comparison between the Radeon 8500, Radeon 9500, vs. Nvidia video cards.

B

Bad Dude

Diamond Member
A while ago, Nvidia video cards was not as sharp as the ATI Radeon cards. How are the 4200, 4800 vs. the ATI Radeon now? Please your real experience only please and I am only concern with 2D quality. I know Nvidia maybe a little faster then Radeon but I am just wanting to know about the 2D.
 
Originally posted by: Boci
Ti4200 cards, especially leadtek have MUCH better 2d image quality than previous geforce cards.
Click to expand...
Nvidias have gotten better, but they still can't beat a good ol' built-by-ATI Radeon in the 2D quality department. Matrox hasn't gotten any worse (they're still better than ATI, but I doubt you could tell a difference on any but the highest quality monitors).

Oh, and Nvidia being faster than ATI? Maybe the vaporwa...er...GFFX, but the last time I checked the Radeon 9700 Pro still obliterates all of Nvidia's other offerings (and it isn't doing too badly compared to the GFFX, either).
 
My friend's Ti4200 isn't very good. I don't know the brand though because it came with his Dell.

My Radeon 9100 (rehashed 8500) is excellent however, on par with my Matrox G450.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top