- Jul 25, 2007
- 314
- 0
- 71
Howdy folks,
My next buy is going to be a new GPU. I'm trying to figure out if there's any value for me in the 290X over the 290 since I'm going to be doing "The Red Mod" or some variation there-of and overclocking whichever card I get. It seems like the 290 and 290X are equivalent other than clockspeed from looking at the spec sheets, if I equivalently clocked a 290 would I see the same performance as would be expected from a 290X? Will a 290X have more overclocking headroom than a 290?
I'm also open to a GTX 780 Ti, since it does seem to perform better in most of the situations I'd be gaming than either of the AMD cards, but it's price is significantly higher, which is the primary reason I'm looking at AMD first. Budget is not solid, but is a concern. If people think a similar mod for the GTX 780 Ti would account in enough headroom to simply blow the similarly modified 290/290X out of the water, it might be worth considering.
Thoughts?
My next buy is going to be a new GPU. I'm trying to figure out if there's any value for me in the 290X over the 290 since I'm going to be doing "The Red Mod" or some variation there-of and overclocking whichever card I get. It seems like the 290 and 290X are equivalent other than clockspeed from looking at the spec sheets, if I equivalently clocked a 290 would I see the same performance as would be expected from a 290X? Will a 290X have more overclocking headroom than a 290?
I'm also open to a GTX 780 Ti, since it does seem to perform better in most of the situations I'd be gaming than either of the AMD cards, but it's price is significantly higher, which is the primary reason I'm looking at AMD first. Budget is not solid, but is a concern. If people think a similar mod for the GTX 780 Ti would account in enough headroom to simply blow the similarly modified 290/290X out of the water, it might be worth considering.
Thoughts?
Last edited:
