- Aug 4, 2000
- 29,544
- 2,219
- 126
Let me advise you to use spell check. I'll send you an invoice.
They are just a bunch of overpaid advisers.
Clients are just as bad, if not worse.
They are just a bunch of overpaid advisers.
If you / your business actually had any in-house competence, you would not need consultants in the first place.
I have more sympathy for consultatnts than their clients. It is the poor consultant who has to put up with the 'this-is-how-we-have-always-done-it-here' half-wits.
I'm dealing with that now. They have business practices that could be streamlined and really make no sense and capture metrics that they'll never use, but they still want them because "they've always collected them." Our initial charter was to convert applications from one platform to another and simplify them, but if anything, they're more complex due to client stubbornness.
Change management is always the hardest part of consulting. One of my coworkers has described the job as teaching industry best practices, incorporating bad design choices at the client's request, and spending the next 2 years convincing them why the industry standard is better.
Teaching smart BI practices to older executives(50+) is damn near impossible. They want to collect everything but never use it in their decision making. Those guys don't understand how computer work and never will.
In one case, they have existing Lotus Notes apps and have about 50 Lotus Notes views in many of the apps for "data analysis." We've discussed this with them and told them that 50 views aren't necessary in SharePoint; you can have a few baseline views and then click "Export to Excel" and you can slice and dice from there with pivot tables, etc. The client agreed. Weeks later, they asked where the 50 views were. We said "We discussed using Excel as your data analysis tool." A few weeks later, "Where are my 50 views?"![]()
They are just a bunch of overpaid advisers.
"We want things to work better, but we don't want to have to change anything."If you / your business actually had any in-house competence, you would not need consultants in the first place.
I have more sympathy for consultatnts than their clients. It is the poor consultant who has to put up with the 'this-is-how-we-have-always-done-it-here' half-wits.
EDIT: Also, my favorite request was to add a certain feature to one of the new apps that only one single person uses and very infrequently at that, at the cost of approximately 40 hours of dev time AND significantly increased complexity.
They are just a bunch of overpaid advisers.
EDIT: Also, my favorite request was to add a certain feature to one of the new apps that only one single person uses and very infrequently at that, at the cost of approximately 40 hours of dev time AND significantly increased complexity.
In one case, they have existing Lotus Notes
my wife's company hires IT consultants who actually do the work that the employees don't have experience with... so...?
I see it as more we-know-lots-and-we-charge-more-since-it's-convenient-to-just-use-us.
Stopped reading right here. They are fucking idiots. As a person forced to use Lotus Notes, I understand how fucking awful it is.
Stopped reading right here. They are fucking idiots. As a person forced to use Lotus Notes, I understand how fucking awful it is.
hey man,, im being paid 6figures to surf ATOT right now, on your dime.
thx!
Lotus Notes is, by far, the worst end user facing enterprise application. The UI hasn't been updated since 1993. Companies would save so much money by killing it off and moving everything to SharePoint. Sadly, we still use it for a bunch of our internal stuff![]()
Lotus Notes is
![]()
wow... haven't visited depair.com in ages.
