• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

.

For example:

zZvaFV4.jpg


Usually there is some kind of tension system with springs or spring steel tabs, to allow the sink some leeway to settle squarely on the CPU.

Its to hold the cooler in place without putting so much tension on the screw and screw hole.
 
What provides the 'spring' in this mounting system? Is it just the flexibility of the bracket?
Yes. The top-side plates provide the tension. They actually make too brackets, these days, it looks like. The add-on one with a screw in the middle, and the included one like pictured. Their mounts haven't used springs for awhile now.

With a cooler like the Macho, I'd want to make a point of using either desktop-style case, or case with a support bracket, regardless of how it mounts to the CPU, though. That's a great deal of possible torquing.
 
Last edited:
Thermalright's is made with tolerances accurate enough to not require spring action without being loose or too tight.

The reason spring is not used is because Intel's IHS requires large pressure to make good contact since it is a concave structure. It's been this way since at least the Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme back in the day.

The springs in the Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme were technically pointless since you are supposed to tighten it all the way down anyways.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top