NO. Society needs laws, but morality should not be legislated.
You can have your own standards and you can live by them all you want, just quit trying to force them on others.
That is the correct term to refer to a "child born out of wedlock"
"Correct", hurm, that's debatable. What isn't is that you're well aware of the negative connotation attached to the expression, just as I am.
It also apparently makes liberals uncomfortable.
Except I already told you I'm not a liberal.
Its what you said. A really free society is chaos.
No, I actually said (if you bothered to read) that just killing someone because you feel like it ISN'T a free society. Who in their right mind would think it did mean that?
Do I need to explain to you how having 22 bastard children with 14 baby mommas is going to increase child poverty.
Well yeah, because you're just assuming facts not in evidence.
Or how lack of an effective father figure would be detrimental to the children.
Many kids grow up without fathers and become well-adapted adults. Also, some of those mommies might hook up with another guy who would become those kids' stepdad. Fact is, you don't know what will happen, you simply assume and pretend that whatever you assume is by default the truth and only outcome.
So you are unfamiliar with the multitude of methods that allow people to "fuck around" without having babies?
I'm uninterested in that (it's you with the obsession about monitoring peoples' fucking habits), I would want to know what your specific plans are for monitoring how many kids they have and with whom.
...Because I can assure you, nobody's going to get along with whatever you propose. You wouldn't go along with it either if it wasn't your own insane crazy idea. If president Barry Obama would announce tomorrow that whatever ideas you may be cooking up in your grubby little mind of yours will be implemented before the year's end... Well, it wouldn't be pretty, that's for sure.