22 kiddies by 14 babiemamas

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
M

MarkLuvsCS

Senior member
Jun 13, 2004
740
0
76
Why is it people like this are allowed to breed. They should sterilize him and the woman who can't keep their legs closed. Where is the outrage from the communities around the US who are just complacent and uncaring with this BS happening constantly. I'm not talking about black people either, plenty of dumb white people having the same problems.
 
Kadarin

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
That guy should be forcibly sterilized. And the women who bang him should be forcibly lobotomized.
 
S

Smoblikat

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2011
5,184
107
106
I knew what he looked like before I read the article.........................
 
F

FaaR

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2007
1,056
412
136
The fascism is strong in this thread.

The true face of america revealed.
 
Matt1970

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
FaaR said:
The fascism is strong in this thread.

The true face of america revealed.
Click to expand...

Wanting someone to support their own kids is fascism? I think you need to look up the definition and then get back to us.
 
F

FaaR

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2007
1,056
412
136
I'm referring to all the calls for forced sterelization and/or lobotimizing. That's decidedly not the same thing as 'wanting someone to support their own kids'.

If someone wants someone else to support their own kids, you write that you want them to support their own kids, not that you want his balls chopped off.

I guess you're simply refusing to see the forest on purpose because of all the trees, your silly dodge is hard to explain any other way.
 
N

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
FaaR said:
I'm referring to all the calls for forced sterelization and/or lobotimizing. That's decidedly not the same thing as 'wanting someone to support their own kids'.

If someone wants someone else to support their own kids, you write that you want them to support their own kids, not that you want his balls chopped off.

I guess you're simply refusing to see the forest on purpose because of all the trees, your silly dodge is hard to explain any other way.
Click to expand...

I think you are missing the part about
It is estimated that the State of Tennessee spends $7,000 a month to help support all of Shaw's children.
Click to expand...

Now maybe you have $7000/month in income sitting around, but I somehow doubt this guy does...

So telling a guy who cannot support his own kids to do so is rather silly. Its called a practical solution.

And on a bigger level a civilized society needs a code of behavior to function. This code can either be enforced socially(as was more the case in the past) or by the state.
 
F

FaaR

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2007
1,056
412
136
nehalem256 said:
I think you are missing the part about
Click to expand...
No, not really, and besides, money > people is generally one of the hallmarks of fascist/corporate rule. So...way to make my point, I think. :)

So telling a guy who cannot support his own kids to do so is rather silly. Its called a practical solution.
Click to expand...
Problem with this 'practical solution' is it opens the door for ambiguity and arbitrariness.

Maybe you think it's obvious with regards to THIS guy, but once you open the door to this kind of action/punishment (btw having kids without ability to support them isn't even illegal I might add), you will encounter corner cases. Some guy may not have 22 kids but rather 18, the next guy has 14 kids, another has 8, 6, and so on. You get fired, your business goes bust or otherwise lose your income, your balls get pre-emptively chopped off per default, what? Where you want the line drawn?

Any place past one kid you choose to draw that line, you will find that one guy gets his balls chopped off permanently while another guy does not. There's no shades of grey when it comes to ball-chopping.

And on a bigger level a civilized society needs a code of behavior to function. This code can either be enforced socially(as was more the case in the past) or by the state.
Click to expand...
So you're endorsing fascist police state rule then. Okay, I getcha. Next, maybe we should decide who is also fit to breed. Set up some criteria, IQ tests, genetic screening...things of that sort. Sounds kosher to you?

Besides, genital mutilation would pretty much assuredly be contrary to the US constitution (pursuit of happyness, if nothing else :cool:), but most americans seem to hate the constitution/america these days unless it directly impacts them personally, then they go off screaming at the top of their lungs how oppressed they are... :rolleyes:

Personally I think merely joking about this sort of stuff is highly offensive, being serious about it takes the whole thing to an entirely different level.
 
Matt1970

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
FaaR said:
I'm referring to all the calls for forced sterelization and/or lobotimizing. That's decidedly not the same thing as 'wanting someone to support their own kids'.

If someone wants someone else to support their own kids, you write that you want them to support their own kids, not that you want his balls chopped off.

I guess you're simply refusing to see the forest on purpose because of all the trees, your silly dodge is hard to explain any other way.
Click to expand...

What exactly did I dodge? And if you don't like their solution, what would be yours?
 
N

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
FaaR said:
No, not really, and besides, money > people is generally one of the hallmarks of fascist/corporate rule. So...way to make my point, I think. :)


Problem with this 'practical solution' is it opens the door for ambiguity and arbitrariness.

Maybe you think it's obvious with regards to THIS guy, but once you open the door to this kind of action/punishment (btw having kids without ability to support them isn't even illegal I might add), you will encounter corner cases. Some guy may not have 22 kids but rather 18, the next guy has 14 kids, another has 8, 6, and so on. You get fired, your business goes bust or otherwise lose your income, your balls get pre-emptively chopped off per default, what? Where you want the line drawn?
Click to expand...

If you have children with more than 2 babymommas/babydaddies you should be sterilized immediately.

FaaR said:
Any place past one kid you choose to draw that line, you will find that one guy gets his balls chopped off permanently while another guy does not. There's no shades of grey when it comes to ball-chopping.


So you're endorsing fascist police state rule then. Okay, I getcha. Next, maybe we should decide who is also fit to breed. Set up some criteria, IQ tests, genetic screening...things of that sort. Sounds kosher to you?

Besides, genital mutilation would pretty much assuredly be contrary to the US constitution (pursuit of happyness, if nothing else :cool:), but most americans seem to hate the constitution/america these days unless it directly impacts them personally, then they go off screaming at the top of their lungs how oppressed they are... :rolleyes:

Personally I think merely joking about this sort of stuff is highly offensive, being serious about it takes the whole thing to an entirely different level.
Click to expand...

So we are clear are you

(1) Advocating for letting children starve

(2) Advocating taking money from moral hard-working American's and giving it to people who repeatedly make horrible life choices.

Who do you hate? Children? Or moral hard-working people?
 
N

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
Jaskalas said:
Think Israel tried that? Only it was the depo shot. Like them, ours would largely be given to minorities. How do you feel about that?
Click to expand...

Actually it was given as a condition for low-skilled immigrants coming into the country.

You left out some important details.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom