- Jun 19, 2000
- 18,890
- 642
- 126
Well, it's all over the news. The data breach is five times bigger than was previously thought. SS numbers, fingerprints, financial, health as well as information about family, acquaintances and residences was stolen over a year long period.
Congress is calling for the head of the OPM, Katherine Archuleta to step down. IMO she should although I realize that she's just a scapegoat. But just how do we assess responsibility for this breach? Someone ultimately has to be responsible.
I don't feel this is an R and D thing at all. This is a government thing that could have occurred under any administration. How does a government secure this type of information as well as all the other information it collects and retains? Is it even possible? This is not an isolated incident although I believe it may be the most massive that we are currently aware of.
Edit: Looks like another thread got started while I was typing.
Congress is calling for the head of the OPM, Katherine Archuleta to step down. IMO she should although I realize that she's just a scapegoat. But just how do we assess responsibility for this breach? Someone ultimately has to be responsible.
I don't feel this is an R and D thing at all. This is a government thing that could have occurred under any administration. How does a government secure this type of information as well as all the other information it collects and retains? Is it even possible? This is not an isolated incident although I believe it may be the most massive that we are currently aware of.
Edit: Looks like another thread got started while I was typing.