What distinguishes a supercar from a sports car or other high performance cars though? Is it the exotic look? I would agree there that the 911's don't look as exotic as some other cars in that price range. Performance? Here I think the 911's can hang with some of the best in the world. The 911 Turbo has been known as the "supercar" daily driver for a long time. Sub 3.0s 0-60, over 200mph top speed, handles with the best of them, etc. Up until this year the
Lightening Lap record was set by a 911. Seems like a pretty good argument for being a supercar. *shrugs*
The definition
is tricky. The Tesla Model 3 performance edition is $57,000 for 0 to 60 in 3.2 seconds, no track or special settings required. Likewise, the Tesla Model S Performance Edition with Ludicrous Mode is $100k for 0 to 60 in 2.4 seconds. Granted, it's limited to a top speed of 155 mph, but that 0 to 60 speed is also turn-key performance. The Ferrari CEO claims that the Tesla is not a supercar - he specifically makes a point about handling, but it's obvious he's never driven a Tesla before:
Sergio Marchionne doesn't think Tesla has created a real supercar.
www.businessinsider.com
But with that said, I look at a Tesla performance model & think "ooh, supercar". In my head, the formula for a super car is:
1. Speed (0 to 60, plus top speed, plus I guess I'd throw in handling & overall performance)
2. Gas engine (noise primarily, plus vibrations, but also ridiculously complex mechanics, lol)
3. Extreme styling
Like, I drive an Ecoboost Mustang as my DD. It's ridiculously fun (0 to 60 in 5.3, has a turbo, comes in stick-shift, 310 horsepower, over 150 pounds lighter than the GT), but man, driving the V8 in my test-drive was
really fun - it was noisy, it shook the car, it was awesome! So I think force-feedback is a big part of performance cars, which has a lot to do with having a gas engine & also having a lot of mechanical things to experience.