2011 F1 Season thread

Page 21 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

The-Noid

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,117
4
76
Personally, I think Pirelli has been too conservative with their tire choices.

Also, I am pretty disappointed with the FIA's coverage of the race. There is no getting around the fact that the race was a snooze-fest, but they could not even cover the race properly.

I am also surprised that Alonso held on to 3rd place comfortably.. as Ferraris are not strong on the harder compounds.

Look at where the mercs finished. Ferarris and Mercs have been good on the high speed courses. I think India actually was really setup for a high speed car.

I don't get Mark Webber. Webber is a great driver but just has not shown it this year.
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
that penalty should have gone to hamilton, 100%. otherwise, boring. ferrari's floppy wing was something i guess.

Also, I am pretty disappointed with the FIA's coverage of the race. There is no getting around the fact that the race was a snooze-fest, but they could not even cover the race properly.

it's actually formula one management (FOM) that produces the tv in all races except monaco and japan. either way, it was weak :p
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
yeah, don't you just hate it when a german in F1 keeps winning and winning...

Schumacher often had to race though, didn't he? Plus, those were really different days with refueling and different strategies. You could put in a light fuel load to get ahead of someone, for example.
 

punjabiplaya

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2006
3,495
1
71
Yeah Schuey did race and often had to alter his strategy just to stay ahead whereas Vettel just sails off into the distance from pole.

lol :
2Gbgi.gif
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
What a race it would be if Vettel got stuck in the back and had to race to the front...

We have seen Webber have difficulty passing people. I wonder if Vettel would have difficulty? I suspect not.
 

The-Noid

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,117
4
76
We got to hear on the BBC coverage over and over again "When you see that heli cam shot of the long orange corner, you know you are at the Indian Grand Prix." Really BBC? I didn't know, because this was the first race and the heli cam was barely up for FP1/2/3 and Qualifying.
 

RiDE

Platinum Member
Jul 8, 2004
2,139
0
76
Didn't get to watch the race but reading the race report was boring enough. :hmm:
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Poor Vettel looked really shell-shocked. Much as it's boring having him win every pole and race, I felt bad that he got knocked out so quickly, through no fault of his own.
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
the double drs had a weird effect, but i'm not sure it's 100% bad. it's not unlike cart's drafting wars in the 90's.

pros -
produces action for the fans in the stands, and tv, to enjoy
adds another dimension to the game. back and forth we go - who will be the first to slip?

cons -
it's artificial
the prolonged battles slow down whoever is involved, and the have little hope of catching the next guy.
 

The-Noid

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,117
4
76
US GP appears to be doa...

Maybe increased construction moves the event to jersey quicker. Either way everything seems to have fallen apart in Texas.
 

busydude

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2010
8,793
5
76
US GP appears to be doa...

Maybe increased construction moves the event to jersey quicker. Either way everything seems to have fallen apart in Texas.

Bernie is skeptical and the track management is waiting for a contract from FOM.. A recipe for disaster I have to say.