2010 Honda Insight review

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,892
572
126
http://www.edmunds.com/insidel...ests/articleId=139246#

Road Tests
2010 Honda Insight EX Full Test and Video


The Insight Goes Mainstream

By Dan Edmunds, Director of Vehicle Testing
Date posted: 01-11-2009

Let's address the elephant in the room first, shall we? Many who have seen early photographs of the 2010 Honda Insight Hybrid have dismissed it as nothing more than a carbon copy of a Toyota Prius.

These people would be wrong.

What "these people" are forgetting is what was said about the current Toyota Prius when it first debuted in the fall of 2003. "It looks like a four-door Honda CRX," they whined.

Honda Copied...Honda
Much of this finger-pointing stems from the nearly horizontal rear glass of the 2010 Honda Insight with its vertical, peekaboo rear window for enhanced rearward visibility.

The vertical glass panel allows the Insight to fully exploit the widely recognized aerodynamic principles of Wunibald Kamm, who discovered that if one abruptly chopped the tail end off a teardrop, the most streamlined of shapes, most of the low-drag goodness would remain. A Kamm back, they call it.

Yes, the Toyota Prius has this very arrangement. But so did the 2000-'06 Honda Insight and the 1988-'91 Honda CRX before it. That the 2010 Insight looks this way is no accident, because Yasunari Seki, chief engineer for the 2010 Honda Insight, made his name at Honda while working on the CRX HF.

And that's just what the 2010 Honda Insight is, more or less: a hybrid version of the late Honda CRX HF, but with four doors, room for five passengers, up-to-date safety features and modern conveniences.

With respect to the 2010 Honda Insight, Honda is guilty of copying no one but itself.

The Honda Hybrid Approach
The trouble with hybrids is that they don't seem to pencil out. We've compared many to their non-hybrid counterparts, but the cost to buy one is never offset by the fuel savings realized.

Of course, the reasons to purchase a hybrid extend beyond saving money at the gas pump, and that's why Toyota Prius owners are likely to be well-heeled early adopters more interested in the philosophical benefits of going green than the financial ones.

But Honda wants the 2010 Insight to be affordable enough for almost anyone. And it wants the Insight to be the kind of hybrid that provides measureable benefits without introducing day-to-day eccentricities. To these ends, Honda has not developed an all-new hybrid system with dual electric motors and a complex series-parallel arrangement, like a Prius.

Instead, Honda has stuck to an approach that has worked for its hybrid cars before: Integrated Motor Assist (IMA), a simple system consisting of an efficient gasoline engine, a conventional continuously variable transmission (CVT) and a thin, brushless electric motor sandwiched between the two. The battery pack is of the tried-and-true nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) variety.

Official pricing is not due until we get closer to the new Insight's release date of April 22, 2009 (yes, that's Earth Day). But the base LX model's price is expected to come in well under $18,000. We figure that this fully optioned 2010 Honda Insight EX-Navi (EX with navigation) should cost less than $22,500 ? at least $5,000 below a comparable Prius.

Output Specifics
The engine in this case is a 1.3-liter inline-4 derived from the Honda Civic Hybrid. Changes for the Insight application include two spark plugs per cylinder and reduced internal friction.

The VTEC variable valve-timing system is also less elaborate. Instead of three VTEC modes, there are but two: a standard cam profile for everyday running and a zero-profile round cam that prevents any valves from opening and creating pumping losses when the Insight runs in full-electric mode.

By itself, this engine makes 88 horsepower and 88 pound-feet of torque. But it seldom runs alone. The IMA electric motor provides up to 13 hp and 58 lb-ft of torque. It's a smaller setup than the 20-hp electric motor found in the Civic Hybrid, because the Insight weighs some 150 pounds less than a Civic. Our test Insight registers 2,736 pounds on our scales.

All told, the combination is good for 98 hp at 5,800 rpm and 123 lb-ft of torque from 1,000-1,500 rpm. On our test track, this produces a run to 60 mph from a standstill in 10.9 seconds (10.5 with seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip) and does the quarter-mile in 17.9 seconds at 77.9 mph. That's a dead heat with the 2009 Fit Sport we recently tested and a trouncing of the 2009 Civic Hybrid by 2 seconds.

That MPG Thing
Mileagewise, the 2010 Honda Insight is expected to be EPA rated at 40 mpg in the city and 43 mpg on the highway. By comparison, a Honda Fit Sport is rated at 27 mpg city and 33 mpg highway. The Civic Hybrid is rated at 40 mpg and 45 mpg, respectively.

Some might complain that the 1991 Honda CRX HF, a non-hybrid, was rated at 40 mpg city and 47 mpg highway (in 2008 terms). What have we gained? Well, how about safety, room for five and a host of power accessories, for starters? Lest you forget the 1991 CRX HF was a stripped two-seater that carried 800 fewer pounds.

We couldn't measure fuel economy on our customary test loops at home, but we devised a 197-mile substitute in Arizona. This suburban loop had more rural two-lanes in it than our usual Orange County course, but we're still impressed by the 51.5-mpg result our 2010 Honda Insight EX achieved.

Suspension Fitness
The 2010 Honda Insight borrows heavily from the strut-based Honda Fit, and in fact the entire chassis and suspension from the firewall forward is pure Fit. The spring and damper calibrations are specifically optimized for the Insight, of course, but the geometry and many of the hard parts are identical.

The rear suspension isn't a direct carryover, but the twist-beam rear axle is the same. The resulting gap between the rear wheels afforded by this layout is filled here with the Power Control Unit (PCU) and a 100.8-volt battery pack with a 5.75 amp-hour capacity. These components are slim enough that a temporary spare tire can perch atop them and still leave 15.9 cubic feet of space behind the seats ? a bit more than a Prius.

Every Honda 2010 Insight rolls on 175/65R15 low-rolling-resistance tires. EX models like this one wear them on cast-aluminum wheels. The brakes are ventilated discs in front and drums in back, with additional drag coming from the IMA, which feeds electrons into the system backward to generate electricity when slowing.

On the road, the 2010 Honda Insight feels more nimble and put together than other hybrids. Some hybrid brake systems feel clumsy because of the regenerative system that's overlaid, but this is not the case here. The fuel-saving electric-assist power steering doesn't feel as precise as that of the Fit when you're going straight down the road, but it responds well and the effort is just right while cornering. In short, the Insight goes where it's pointed, feels secure and doesn't display the compromises we've noticed in previous hybrids.

At the track, our EX stops smartly from 60 mph in 125 feet. Its 0.79g performance on the skid pad is respectable for an economy car on skinny tires. But the slalom performance of 59.3 mph required our test-driver to conquer a bit of oversteer with the stability control turned off ? something worth noting because the Insight LX does not have stability control.

Looking Inward
To enhance fuel economy, the Insight features a comprehensive Eco-Assist driver coaching system. A Civic-style two-tiered instrument layout is used, and the background of the high-mounted digital speedometer changes from blue to green to indicate how efficiently we're driving.

An Eco-Guide page in the multi-information display grows leaves to indicate our performance over a trip and frames a bar graph that encourages gentle use of throttle and brakes. When the Insight's key is removed, an eco score lingers to indicate how we've done over the life of the car.

They've managed to turn the 2010 Honda Insight into a rolling fuel-economy video game, but without making it distracting.

An "ECON" mode button (green, of course) makes it easier to score higher and improve fuel economy. Engaging it desensitizes the throttle pedal, re-optimizes the CVT and IMA control programs for thrift, increases the time that the air-conditioning compressor is disengaged and makes the cruise control less aggressive in sustaining speed. In short, the Insight becomes more sluggish.

The Insight's overall dash design is nodular and busy, but the major controls are close at hand and the fit and finish is good. We find the front seats roomy and comfortable. And, unlike in the Toyota Prius, the steering wheel telescopes and the driver seat adjusts for height, so our tallest tester settled in with no trouble.

The same cannot be said for the backseat. Those approaching 6 feet in height will feel the roof and wish for more legroom. The Insight's 100.4-inch wheelbase needs an additional inch or two. This, above all, reminds us that the Insight is indeed a compact car. It will not make a good eco-taxi.

Final Insights
Power windows and mirrors are standard equipment for every Insight, as are automatic climate control and an MP3 jack. Must-have techie features like shift paddles, Bluetooth and an integrated iPod and USB connection are standard on EX models.

So even though the Insight is a compact hybrid that gets very good fuel economy, the equipment list won't make you feel cheated. And there's nothing weird about it; the Insight drives like a regular Honda.

All told, the 2010 Honda Insight hits much more than it misses. And the pricing makes it a compelling choice that just may pencil out. So what if some people insist it looks like a Prius?

-----------

I am really liking this car. Hopefully it will be more comfortable than my Mazda 3 and offer a somewhat sporty driving experience.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Hmm. It's light enough to handle well, not agonizingly slow (well, some here in the Garage are power addicts, lol). Outstanding fuel economy, and probably reliable.

Win! Now on to the Volt and other domestic hybrids, hopefully they measure up and then some.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,553
942
126
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Hmm. It's light enough to handle well, not agonizingly slow (well, some here in the Garage are power addicts, lol). Outstanding fuel economy, and probably reliable.

Win! Now on to the Volt and other domestic hybrids, hopefully they measure up and then some.

My motorcycle gets 50mpg and does 0-60mph if 4 seconds flat. I filled it up for $5 yesterday.

Just sayin' :p
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,106
12,519
136
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Hmm. It's light enough to handle well, not agonizingly slow (well, some here in the Garage are power addicts, lol). Outstanding fuel economy, and probably reliable.

Win! Now on to the Volt and other domestic hybrids, hopefully they measure up and then some.

My motorcycle gets 50mpg and does 0-60mph if 4 seconds flat. I filled it up for $5 yesterday.

Just sayin' :p

and it has less HP too ;) :p
 

angry hampster

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2007
4,232
0
0
www.lexaphoto.com
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Hmm. It's light enough to handle well, not agonizingly slow (well, some here in the Garage are power addicts, lol). Outstanding fuel economy, and probably reliable.

Win! Now on to the Volt and other domestic hybrids, hopefully they measure up and then some.

My motorcycle gets 50mpg and does 0-60mph if 4 seconds flat. I filled it up for $5 yesterday.

Just sayin' :p

Well yea but you can't carry a family a four on a motorcycle unless you're vietnamese. Even then you can't carry your luggage.
 

adlep

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2001
5,287
6
81
Originally posted by: angry hampster
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Hmm. It's light enough to handle well, not agonizingly slow (well, some here in the Garage are power addicts, lol). Outstanding fuel economy, and probably reliable.

Win! Now on to the Volt and other domestic hybrids, hopefully they measure up and then some.

My motorcycle gets 50mpg and does 0-60mph if 4 seconds flat. I filled it up for $5 yesterday.

Just sayin' :p

Well yea but you can't carry a family a four on a motorcycle unless you're vietnamese. Even then you can't carry your luggage.

Lol...
Google Trike Patrol...
:D
 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
Yes, but does it make economic sense to buy it?

You're getting Civic Hybrid economy for regular Civic prices. I'd say that's a resounding "yes."

The only thing that would stop me from buying this in the upcoming CR-Z Hybrid.
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
41
91
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
Yes, but does it make economic sense to buy it?

If you're looking at that class of vehicle already, then it would seem to as the prices they list are comparable to a Civic (LX trim being around $18,000 and fully-loaded topping out at $22,500).

If you were looking at something the size of the Fit, then you're probably not going to see the payoff for a comparably equipped vehicle (since the base Fit comes in around $14,750 and tops out at about $18,000).

Comparing base to base let's see:

Fit:
$14,750
27/33, let's say that you can average 31.
At 15,000 miles per year, you use 483.87 gallons.

Insight:
$18,000
40/43, let's say that you can average 42 (based on the Edmunds test, this seems pessimistic).
At 15,000 miles per year, you use 357.14 gallons.

The price difference is $3,250. At $4.00/gallon that would be 812.5 gallons of gasoline. The difference in gallons used per year is 126.73 gallons.

So it would take about 6.4 years (96,000 miles) to recoup the difference in dollars between a base Fit and a base Insight if the price of gasoline is $4.00/gallon. This will be even longer if you were to invest the $3,250 rather than simply letting it sit.

So, if all you're trying to do is save money, you're still better off with the lower initial cost of the Fit unless you plan on keeping the car for a very long time.

ZV
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Yay for the return of (sort of) light, small cars! Hopefully this will hit the used market by the time I'm ready to replace my '89.:D
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,756
600
126
Looks like a pretty cool entry...first hybrid that I may actually consider purchasing.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
Yes, but does it make economic sense to buy it?

If you're looking at that class of vehicle already, then it would seem to as the prices they list are comparable to a Civic (LX trim being around $18,000 and fully-loaded topping out at $22,500).

If you were looking at something the size of the Fit, then you're probably not going to see the payoff for a comparably equipped vehicle (since the base Fit comes in around $14,750 and tops out at about $18,000).

Comparing base to base let's see:

Fit:
$14,750
27/33, let's say that you can average 31.
At 15,000 miles per year, you use 483.87 gallons.

Insight:
$18,000
40/43, let's say that you can average 42 (based on the Edmunds test, this seems pessimistic).
At 15,000 miles per year, you use 357.14 gallons.

The price difference is $3,250. At $4.00/gallon that would be 812.5 gallons of gasoline. The difference in gallons used per year is 126.73 gallons.

So it would take about 6.4 years (96,000 miles) to recoup the difference in dollars between a base Fit and a base Insight if the price of gasoline is $4.00/gallon. This will be even longer if you were to invest the $3,250 rather than simply letting it sit.

So, if all you're trying to do is save money, you're still better off with the lower initial cost of the Fit unless you plan on keeping the car for a very long time.

ZV

Good info. Another intangible to think about at this time would be the resale value and demand aspect. Hard to predict, but in 5 years (pretty average time by which someone who bought a new car is trading in / selling), the Insight might bring a notably larger % of original cost back to the buyer. A lot of this depends on things we can't know right now, future gas prices, consumer reaction to the vehicle, and so on.

 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt

So it would take about 6.4 years (96,000 miles) to recoup the difference in dollars between a base Fit and a base Insight if the price of gasoline is $4.00/gallon. This will be even longer if you were to invest the $3,250 rather than simply letting it sit.

So, if all you're trying to do is save money, you're still better off with the lower initial cost of the Fit unless you plan on keeping the car for a very long time.

ZV

Those numbers are right given your assumptions, but if you let the Insight earn 51 MPG, as Edmunds was able to achieve on their test run, then the break-even point falls to 64,200 miles (or 4.28 years at 15,000 miles a year). Personally, I'd break even in less than two years at that mileage. Even given your less optimistic projection, the gas savings would cover the increased car payment on a typical 60-month car loan, and the rest would be gravy.

Driven to 200,000 miles at 51 MPG, the Insight would save you nearly $7000 after covering the price difference. And chances are the Insight would have a higher resale value at that point, saving even more money. That's not chump change for people buying cars in this segment.


 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,393
8,552
126
The engine in this case is a 1.3-liter inline-4 derived from the Honda Civic Hybrid. Changes for the Insight application include two spark plugs per cylinder and reduced internal friction.
uh, the civic hybrid had two spark plugs per cylinder. i didn't believe it until i looked under the hood of one.
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
41
91
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt

So it would take about 6.4 years (96,000 miles) to recoup the difference in dollars between a base Fit and a base Insight if the price of gasoline is $4.00/gallon. This will be even longer if you were to invest the $3,250 rather than simply letting it sit.

So, if all you're trying to do is save money, you're still better off with the lower initial cost of the Fit unless you plan on keeping the car for a very long time.

ZV

Those numbers are right given your assumptions, but if you let the Insight earn 51 MPG, as Edmunds was able to achieve on their test run, then the break-even point falls to 64,200 miles (or 4.28 years at 15,000 miles a year). Personally, I'd break even in less than two years at that mileage. Even given your less optimistic projection, the gas savings would cover the increased car payment on a typical 60-month car loan, and the rest would be gravy.

Driven to 200,000 miles at 51 MPG, the Insight would save you nearly $7000 after covering the price difference. And chances are the Insight would have a higher resale value at that point, saving even more money. That's not chump change for people buying cars in this segment.

15,000 miles per year is already slightly above average mileage on a car, obviously if someone drives more then the break-even period is shorter. And I admitted that the number for the Insight was pessimistic based on Edmunds' results.

Most people do not keep a car for 100,000 miles and I intended to posit an average scenario. Most people who buy a brand new car will keep a car for 60,000 miles or less. In those situations, a hybrid still doesn't make sense. For someone who intended to drive the car until the wheels fell off, it might be different (I only say "might" because the cost of replacement batteries is currently unknown, in all likelihood it would certainly be different).

ZV
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,756
600
126
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt

So it would take about 6.4 years (96,000 miles) to recoup the difference in dollars between a base Fit and a base Insight if the price of gasoline is $4.00/gallon. This will be even longer if you were to invest the $3,250 rather than simply letting it sit.

So, if all you're trying to do is save money, you're still better off with the lower initial cost of the Fit unless you plan on keeping the car for a very long time.

ZV

Those numbers are right given your assumptions, but if you let the Insight earn 51 MPG, as Edmunds was able to achieve on their test run, then the break-even point falls to 64,200 miles (or 4.28 years at 15,000 miles a year). Personally, I'd break even in less than two years at that mileage. Even given your less optimistic projection, the gas savings would cover the increased car payment on a typical 60-month car loan, and the rest would be gravy.

Driven to 200,000 miles at 51 MPG, the Insight would save you nearly $7000 after covering the price difference. And chances are the Insight would have a higher resale value at that point, saving even more money. That's not chump change for people buying cars in this segment.

15,000 miles per year is already slightly above average mileage on a car, obviously if someone drives more then the break-even period is shorter. And I admitted that the number for the Insight was pessimistic based on Edmunds' results.

Most people do not keep a car for 100,000 miles and I intended to posit an average scenario. Most people who buy a brand new car will keep a car for 60,000 miles or less. In those situations, a hybrid still doesn't make sense. For someone who intended to drive the car until the wheels fell off, it might be different (I only say "might" because the cost of replacement batteries is currently unknown, in all likelihood it would certainly be different).

ZV

I think your numbers were very fair to the hybrid. Yes, you can squeeze more mileage out of the Insight with careful driving but the same is true of the Fit. EPA numbers gives you as apples to apples a comparison as you can get.

Not to mention, you used $4/gallon gasoline. No one knows where oil is heading in the next year, 2 years, 5 years, etc...but I'd say $4/gallon is a pretty easy on the hybrid assumption to use.
 

Vetterin

Senior member
Aug 31, 2004
973
0
71
While 15,000 miles per year is the number we are using there are many people (I being one) that are driving 25,000+ miles a year. I sure am considering going from a 26 mpg Subaru to a 46 mpg Insight which at even $3.00 gal could save me $25-$30 per week.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: Vetterin
While 15,000 miles per year is the number we are using there are many people (I being one) that are driving 25,000+ miles a year. I sure am considering going from a 26 mpg Subaru to a 46 mpg Insight which at even $3.00 gal could save me $25-$30 per week.

I drive ~18k miles yearly year in North Texas, and I don't even work that far from home. I think it has to do with the sprawl of our metro area.

Anyone who drives more than 12k/yearly could see significant savings going from a ~20mpg vehicle to a ~40mpg vehicle, even at relatively cheap gas prices.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Looks like a winner! :)

So is it only available in CVT? Oops, fail.

Also, does the engine employ lean burn technology?

In the original Insight, the CVT versions had a completely different engine with a lower compression ratio and no lean-burn.

Lean burn technology is what enables the original Insight to get 70-80, sometimes even 90MPG. When lean burn kicks on, you feel the loss in power, but the instant MPG gauge jumps about 25MPG.

It's pretty cool. It's like having two different engines in the same car. With the engine in lean burn mode, the power range is completely different... Not in a good way, but in a fuel saving way.
 

Uhtrinity

Platinum Member
Dec 21, 2003
2,263
202
106
Some of the early Civic Hybrids had lean burn also as well as standard transmissions. But there doesn't seem to much consistency there. Lean burn puts out higher nox which the automakers seem to want to avoid.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Some of the early Civic Hybrids had lean burn also as well as standard transmissions. But there doesn't seem to much consistency there. Lean burn puts out higher nox which the automakers seem to want to avoid.

Bah... Screw NOx, run it up to 50:1! lol
 

Mermaidman

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2003
7,987
93
91
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Vetterin
While 15,000 miles per year is the number we are using there are many people (I being one) that are driving 25,000+ miles a year. I sure am considering going from a 26 mpg Subaru to a 46 mpg Insight which at even $3.00 gal could save me $25-$30 per week.

I drive ~18k miles yearly year in North Texas, and I don't even work that far from home. I think it has to do with the sprawl of our metro area.

Anyone who drives more than 12k/yearly could see significant savings going from a ~20mpg vehicle to a ~40mpg vehicle, even at relatively cheap gas prices.

I recall hearing that the greatest impact on economy is improving MPG at the lower end of the spectrum (e.g. going from 15 MPG to 20 MPG). I'm not smart enough to do the calculations--can anyone verify that?
 

Uhtrinity

Platinum Member
Dec 21, 2003
2,263
202
106
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Some of the early Civic Hybrids had lean burn also as well as standard transmissions. But there doesn't seem to much consistency there. Lean burn puts out higher nox which the automakers seem to want to avoid.

Bah... Screw NOx, run it up to 50:1! lol

Well, it will already run as high as 25:1, and with a simple mod you can make it easier to stay in the lean burn window. I have done this one myself.

Link

The Prius in comparison runs just under 15:1.


Oh, and the nox output is so low it surprises me they are that concerned, though it allows them to use the super ultra low or partial zero emission stickers.