- Mar 25, 2001
- 5,287
- 6
- 81
Looks like GM works best under the bankruptcy pressure...
Look at the interior - finally nice!
Good stuff and about time dammit...
Look at the interior - finally nice!
Good stuff and about time dammit...
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Yep, 8 replies in 12 hours...
Splitting the forums was a fucking great idea.
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Yep, 8 replies in 12 hours...
Splitting the forums was a fucking great idea.
so what says the president of the anti-SUV brigade?
i don't care about the SUV/CUV market too much, so there's little reason for me to post here (even though my parents are looking at something like a hyundai santa fe to replace my mom's van that got wrecked in an accident. stupid driver :| mom is ok though )
i wonder why they didn't use the 2.0T from the cobalt SS et al for the four cylinder version? seems like the added HP and torque would be well suited for a vehicle the size of the equinox, and offers more power than either the powerplants shown, while probably giving better fuel economy to boot
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Yep, 8 replies in 12 hours...
Splitting the forums was a fucking great idea.
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
the 2.0l DI engine as found in the SS, GXP/Redline is not only turbod, but requires 93, also is 360 hp... 80 more than the 1.4l, it is more expensive, more specialized...
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
the 2.0l DI engine as found in the SS, GXP/Redline is not only turbod, but requires 93, also is 360 hp... 80 more than the 1.4l, it is more expensive, more specialized...
using the 2.0T would allow them to use one engine across the entire model line though, saving lots of $$ i'd imagine. just because it's meant for the SS/GXP/RL crowd doesn't mean it can't be tuned for more light-footed driving.