The Ion's real problem isn't so much what's underneath as it is what's inside. Its ratings in the interior design and materials quality categories were abysmally low. None of our editors were impressed with the Ion's center-mounted gauge design or flimsy plastic trim. Comments ranged from "Are we sure this is the new model?" to "Thank God they moved the gauges to the center; now I have a clear view of all the cheap plastic dash trim."
As if that wasn't bad enough, the Ion made out even worse in the seat comfort categories, where it was once again lambasted for poor design and materials quality. The most common complaint was a near total lack of contour that left one editor complaining, "I was uncomfortable in less than an hour behind the wheel ? so much for its road trip potential." The vinyl-covered headrests did little to help matters, while the upholstery reminded one editor of "cheap polyester pants rather than the neoprene I think they were shooting for."
Rear-seat accommodations were deemed equally oppressive, as the rear bench lacks acceptable support while forcing riders to sit too upright to be comfortable. When it comes to legroom, the Ion offers two inches less than the Civic despite the fact that the car's overall length exceeds the Honda's by 10 inches. Most of the space must have gone into the trunk ? the Ion leads the class with 14.7 cubic feet of available capacity.
For anyone who thinks we're being too harsh on the fledging Saturn sedan, consider that in addition to earning the lowest scores in the previously mentioned areas the Ion was also ranked last in the following categories: visibility, braking, fun to drive, rattles and squeaks, secondary controls, exterior design and overall build quality. Although it's always easy to pile on the stragglers with condescending scores, each editor ranked the car after independent test-drives without any knowledge of the scores their peers were given.