Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=2381550
photo
second photo
sooo fugly
Originally posted by: ElFenix
it somehow manages to look tiny and fat at the same time.
is that an irs?
Originally posted by: jacktackle
People are so damn picky/fussy when it comes to how vehicles look. It doesn't look so bad, not that i like it.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: jacktackle
People are so damn picky/fussy when it comes to how vehicles look. It doesn't look so bad, not that i like it.
I agree. People will actually call vehicles like the 2007 Wrangler ugly, when there is nothing that could possibly be percieved as ugly about it.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: jacktackle
People are so damn picky/fussy when it comes to how vehicles look. It doesn't look so bad, not that i like it.
I agree. People will actually call vehicles like the 2007 Wrangler ugly, when there is nothing that could possibly be percieved as ugly about it.
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: jacktackle
People are so damn picky/fussy when it comes to how vehicles look. It doesn't look so bad, not that i like it.
I agree. People will actually call vehicles like the 2007 Wrangler ugly, when there is nothing that could possibly be percieved as ugly about it.
it is ugly, but ugly in a completely functional, we don't really care what it looks like because it gets the job done better than anything else way.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: jacktackle
People are so damn picky/fussy when it comes to how vehicles look. It doesn't look so bad, not that i like it.
I agree. People will actually call vehicles like the 2007 Wrangler ugly, when there is nothing that could possibly be percieved as ugly about it.
it is ugly, but ugly in a completely functional, we don't really care what it looks like because it gets the job done better than anything else way.
I just wouldn't call functional "ugly". Humvees aren't ugly, stealth fighters aren't ugly, tanks aren't ugly, military supply trucks aren't ugly, so why would a Wrangler be considered ugly?
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=2381550
photo
second photo
sooo fugly
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: jacktackle
People are so damn picky/fussy when it comes to how vehicles look. It doesn't look so bad, not that i like it.
I agree. People will actually call vehicles like the 2007 Wrangler ugly, when there is nothing that could possibly be percieved as ugly about it.
it is ugly, but ugly in a completely functional, we don't really care what it looks like because it gets the job done better than anything else way.
I just wouldn't call functional "ugly". Humvees aren't ugly, stealth fighters aren't ugly, tanks aren't ugly, military supply trucks aren't ugly, so why would a Wrangler be considered ugly?
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
I just wouldn't call functional "ugly". Humvees aren't ugly, stealth fighters aren't ugly, tanks aren't ugly, military supply trucks aren't ugly, so why would a Wrangler be considered ugly?
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: jacktackle
People are so damn picky/fussy when it comes to how vehicles look. It doesn't look so bad, not that i like it.
I agree. People will actually call vehicles like the 2007 Wrangler ugly, when there is nothing that could possibly be percieved as ugly about it.
it is ugly, but ugly in a completely functional, we don't really care what it looks like because it gets the job done better than anything else way.
I just wouldn't call functional "ugly". Humvees aren't ugly, stealth fighters aren't ugly, tanks aren't ugly, military supply trucks aren't ugly, so why would a Wrangler be considered ugly?