Originally posted by: Frackal
From playing 3 betas and 1 demo:
UT3
Frontlines Fuel of War
Crysis
COD-4
I can say without equivocation that Crysis is so far beyond these other games in terms of sophistication, graphics, feel, intensity, atmosphere... UT3 is decent but Crysis truly is an order of magnitude beyond these games based upon the 5 so far.
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Frackal
From playing 3 betas and 1 demo:
UT3
Frontlines Fuel of War
Crysis
COD-4
I can say without equivocation that Crysis is so far beyond these other games in terms of sophistication, graphics, feel, intensity, atmosphere... UT3 is decent but Crysis truly is an order of magnitude beyond these games based upon the 5 so far.
are you serious?
Originally posted by: Zenoth
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Frackal
From playing 3 betas and 1 demo:
UT3
Frontlines Fuel of War
Crysis
COD-4
I can say without equivocation that Crysis is so far beyond these other games in terms of sophistication, graphics, feel, intensity, atmosphere... UT3 is decent but Crysis truly is an order of magnitude beyond these games based upon the 5 so far.
are you serious?
pontifex, I think that the majority of PC gamers, so far, especially those who have the chance to be part of the multi-player beta for Crysis, will often say things like Frackal said simple due to the graphics of the game (and perhaps the sounds, too). When was the least time we saw such a graphics revolution around on the PC ? Was it in 2004 with FarCry ? Perhaps Half-Life 2 ? It certainly wasn't for Doom 3 or Prey later on.
I think that Crysis is, finally, a title that has the potential to push the enthusiasts hardware to the limits, something that we've very rarely seen in the history of PC gaming simply because developers always had to, and still have to "optimize" their titles (which often means cutting down visual features) for the lower-end market, which in my opinion has contributed, and still to this day contribute to slow down the graphics evolution process (and perhaps not just the graphics, but things like particle systems and physics).
Crysis is the epitome in PC gaming visuals, it is its main selling point (anyone telling me that the story is original deserves to stay away from gaming altogether), and because we PC gamers have rarely if ever seen such a change for the best in terms of graphics on our platform I believe that the direct effect of it is to already pretend that the game, even though no one knows if the single-player part is fun at all, is perhaps the sliced-bread of PC gaming (or at least of the FPS genre as a whole).
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Zenoth
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Frackal
From playing 3 betas and 1 demo:
UT3
Frontlines Fuel of War
Crysis
COD-4
I can say without equivocation that Crysis is so far beyond these other games in terms of sophistication, graphics, feel, intensity, atmosphere... UT3 is decent but Crysis truly is an order of magnitude beyond these games based upon the 5 so far.
are you serious?
pontifex, I think that the majority of PC gamers, so far, especially those who have the chance to be part of the multi-player beta for Crysis, will often say things like Frackal said simple due to the graphics of the game (and perhaps the sounds, too). When was the least time we saw such a graphics revolution around on the PC ? Was it in 2004 with FarCry ? Perhaps Half-Life 2 ? It certainly wasn't for Doom 3 or Prey later on.
I think that Crysis is, finally, a title that has the potential to push the enthusiasts hardware to the limits, something that we've very rarely seen in the history of PC gaming simply because developers always had to, and still have to "optimize" their titles (which often means cutting down visual features) for the lower-end market, which in my opinion has contributed, and still to this day contribute to slow down the graphics evolution process (and perhaps not just the graphics, but things like particle systems and physics).
Crysis is the epitome in PC gaming visuals, it is its main selling point (anyone telling me that the story is original deserves to stay away from gaming altogether), and because we PC gamers have rarely if ever seen such a change for the best in terms of graphics on our platform I believe that the direct effect of it is to already pretend that the game, even though no one knows if the single-player part is fun at all, is perhaps the sliced-bread of PC gaming (or at least of the FPS genre as a whole).
is he talking just graphics only? it doesn't sound like it to me. while it may have better graphics than the other games (didn't see it on my system), it could be a mod for BF2. its almost the exact same gameplay as BF2 (for MP anyway). i don't know how thats not banal and old.
It's basically a ruined city where you lead a squad of six paranormal soldiers to fight supernatural enemies and prevent Armageddon. The soldiers have conventional weaponry and also paranormal abilities.By the way, what's Jericho ?
Originally posted by: Zenoth
Unreal Tournament 3
BioShock
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl
Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars
World in Conflict
TimeShift
Call of Duty 4
Lost Planet: Extreme Condition
Originally posted by: Miklebud
HELL YEAH! In my time as a PC Gamer, this has been the most exciting and anticipated of all my years. I'm overwhelmed at the moment. But I'm loving every minute of it!!