2006 World Cup Red Card Rule

[eits]

anyone know it? before, it was a 2 or 3 game suspension or something. has it changed?

i'm gonna be pissed if we're gonna have to face brazil with only 10 players after beating ghana with 9 players.

 

[Lonyo]

The only way you would face Ghana with 10 men is if 13 players had suspensions....

 

[eits]

Originally posted by: Lonyo
The only way you would face Ghana with 10 men is if 13 players had suspensions....

huh?

 

[z0mb13]

a red card for the next game only affects that player, not the team.

so lets say player A gets a red card in a game, then on that game the team will only have 10 players. But on the next game it is back to normal 11 players but player A cannot play in that game.

 

[Lonyo]

Originally posted by: z0mb13
a red card for the next game only affects that player, not the team.

so lets say player A gets a red card in a game, then on that game the team will only have 10 players. But on the next game it is back to normal 11 players but player A cannot play in that game.

Oh, he had no clue about red cards/suspensions. I see.
I assumed people would have knowledge of football (I am totally clueless about American Rugby Football).

 

[DainBramaged]

Originally posted by: Lonyo

Originally posted by: z0mb13
a red card for the next game only affects that player, not the team.

so lets say player A gets a red card in a game, then on that game the team will only have 10 players. But on the next game it is back to normal 11 players but player A cannot play in that game.

Oh, he had no clue about red cards/suspensions. I see.
I assumed people would have knowledge of football (I am totally clueless about American Rugby Football).

Is that what they call the NFL?

 

[FallenHero]

Originally posted by: DainBramaged

Originally posted by: Lonyo

Originally posted by: z0mb13
a red card for the next game only affects that player, not the team.

so lets say player A gets a red card in a game, then on that game the team will only have 10 players. But on the next game it is back to normal 11 players but player A cannot play in that game.

Oh, he had no clue about red cards/suspensions. I see.
I assumed people would have knowledge of football (I am totally clueless about American Rugby Football).

Is that what they call the NFL?

Rugby implies they are men, as they don't wear pads in real rugby.

 

[eits]

Originally posted by: z0mb13
a red card for the next game only affects that player, not the team.

so lets say player A gets a red card in a game, then on that game the team will only have 10 players. But on the next game it is back to normal 11 players but player A cannot play in that game.

?

red card = 3 game suspension with chance of appeal.... that's the way it used to be.

i was wondering if fifa changed the rule so that the affected player would only be ejected for that game.

2 yellow cards = 1 game suspension.

that's why i said the thing about having only 10 people on the field next game and not 9 against brazil (9 against ghana).

 

[eits]

bump

 

[eits]

bump

 

[FallenHero]

yeah...its been stated. Its a one game suspension for the player only, not the team. Stop bumping the thread.

Any red card = 1 game suspension.

 

[astralusion]

the point that they are making is that even if a plyaer, say mastreoni is suspended for 3 games, the US team still plays will 11 men in their game against ghana, it's just those who got red cards cannot participate.

 

[eits]

Originally posted by: astralusion
the point that they are making is that even if a plyaer, say mastreoni is suspended for 3 games, the US team still plays will 11 men in their game against ghana, it's just those who got red cards cannot participate.

ooooh. duh. ok. gotcha.

thanks.

yeah, i dunno why that slipped my mind... i kinda feel like an idiot because i already knew that but completely forgot.

 

[Insane3D]

Originally posted by: eits

Originally posted by: astralusion
the point that they are making is that even if a plyaer, say mastreoni is suspended for 3 games, the US team still plays will 11 men in their game against ghana, it's just those who got red cards cannot participate.

ooooh. duh. ok. gotcha.

thanks.

yeah, i dunno why that slipped my mind... i kinda feel like an idiot because i already knew that but completely forgot.

Umm...z0mb13 gave you the same answer above...

😕

 

[eits]

Originally posted by: Insane3D

Originally posted by: eits

Originally posted by: astralusion
the point that they are making is that even if a plyaer, say mastreoni is suspended for 3 games, the US team still plays will 11 men in their game against ghana, it's just those who got red cards cannot participate.

ooooh. duh. ok. gotcha.

thanks.

yeah, i dunno why that slipped my mind... i kinda feel like an idiot because i already knew that but completely forgot.

Umm...z0mb13 gave you the same answer above...

😕

yeah, i didn't read it the whole way because i was watching the game.

 

[Insane3D]

I missed it...who won?

I need to remember to wake up before 2pm...😛

 

[eits]

Originally posted by: Insane3D
I missed it...who won?

I need to remember to wake up before 2pm...😛

brazil 2-nil

it was a really great game, though. the ref was AWESOME. neither team took dives to get fouls called... they fought for the ball and it was very physical soccer, just the way it's supposed to be. it was close the whole game up until the end.

it was definitely a match between two world class teams. i was very impressed with australia's team.

 

[TheShiz]

Originally posted by: eits
anyone know it? before, it was a 2 or 3 game suspension or something. has it changed?

i'm gonna be pissed if we're gonna have to face brazil with only 10 players after beating ghana with 9 players.

you're playing in the world cup and don't know the rules? (of course I'm being sarcastic, so stop wondering)