F Ferzerp Diamond Member Oct 12, 1999 6,438 107 106 Mar 5, 2012 #26 AstroManLuca said: Low mileage is nice, but it's too old to be commanding that kind of a price. Click to expand... Both KBB and NADA disagree with you.
AstroManLuca said: Low mileage is nice, but it's too old to be commanding that kind of a price. Click to expand... Both KBB and NADA disagree with you.
B ballmode Lifer Aug 17, 2005 10,246 2 0 Mar 5, 2012 #27 all these luxo sedans drop like a rock in resale value
AstroManLuca Lifer Jun 24, 2004 15,628 5 81 Mar 5, 2012 #28 Ferzerp said: Both KBB and NADA disagree with you. Click to expand... KBB isn't always that accurate. But I guess since it's an SRT8 it'll command a higher price. I forgot about that.
Ferzerp said: Both KBB and NADA disagree with you. Click to expand... KBB isn't always that accurate. But I guess since it's an SRT8 it'll command a higher price. I forgot about that.
B ballmode Lifer Aug 17, 2005 10,246 2 0 Mar 5, 2012 #29 if you get a cts-v 2004/2005 have the 5.7 LS1, the 2006 till the Supercharged new CTS-V have the 6.0L LS2
if you get a cts-v 2004/2005 have the 5.7 LS1, the 2006 till the Supercharged new CTS-V have the 6.0L LS2
SeventySeven Golden Member Oct 4, 2001 1,196 0 76 Mar 12, 2012 #30 As an owner of a 300C SRT8 - I'd have to say that one is a bit too much - in styling and in price.