I don't understand this. Looking at MSNBC and L.A. Times, how come they look at the total medals won instead of how many gold medals there are?
Isn't gold medal much more valuable than silver and bronze? Whoever has the most gold medals should be placed first, isn't it? It doesn't matter how many silver and bronze medal a country won, that country should still placed below a country with only one gold medal.
Isn't gold medal much more valuable than silver and bronze? Whoever has the most gold medals should be placed first, isn't it? It doesn't matter how many silver and bronze medal a country won, that country should still placed below a country with only one gold medal.
