2004 Kawasaki ZX-10R Track Test: First Day

[Fausto]

Kawasaki is claiming 172 horsepower at the crank without ram air, and roughly 180 horsepower at the crank with air being fed through the single nostril at the front of the bike.
Holy sh*t!! That's Hayabusa territory with 300 fewer cc's. :Q:Q

 

[Beau]

It still blows me a away to see a BIKE with 2x as much horse power as my first car.

 

[boyRacer]

Did they ever put the new R1 on the dyno? ... they were basically claiming more or less the same thing... which i doubt... 😛

Id still take the R1 over this though... but i'll run out of talent within 5 minutes. 🙁

 

[StageLeft]

Originally posted by: Beau
It still blows me a away to see a BIKE with 2x as much horse power as my first car.

Since you drive an old porsche it's still got more than your current car doesn't it 😉

Those things are freaking death rockets. Too fast for me!!

 

[Beau]

Originally posted by: Skoorb

Originally posted by: Beau
It still blows me a away to see a BIKE with 2x as much horse power as my first car.

Since you drive an old porsche it's still got more than your current car doesn't it 😉

Those things are freaking death rockets. Too fast for me!!

It definitely has more than the Porsche, and my VW passat.

 

[StageLeft]

Originally posted by: Beau

Originally posted by: Skoorb

Originally posted by: Beau
It still blows me a away to see a BIKE with 2x as much horse power as my first car.

Since you drive an old porsche it's still got more than your current car doesn't it 😉

Those things are freaking death rockets. Too fast for me!!

It definitely has more than the Porsche, and my VW passat.

man, that's why you need to buy a - well, this thread isn't about Nissan, so I'll stop.

 

[Fausto]

Originally posted by: boyRacer
Did they ever put the new R1 on the dyno? ... they were basically claiming more or less the same thing... which i doubt... 😛

Id still take the R1 over this though... but i'll run out of talent within 5 minutes. 🙁

The R1 is a much nicer-looking bike, IMO and the difference in performance between the two is completely moot at street speeds.

 

[Beau]

Originally posted by: Skoorb

Originally posted by: Beau

Originally posted by: Skoorb

Originally posted by: Beau
It still blows me a away to see a BIKE with 2x as much horse power as my first car.

Since you drive an old porsche it's still got more than your current car doesn't it 😉

Those things are freaking death rockets. Too fast for me!!

It definitely has more than the Porsche, and my VW passat.

man, that's why you need to buy a - well, this thread isn't about Nissan, so I'll stop.

I need to by another XTerra. I miss that truck sooooooo much. Besides, who cares if this isn't a Nissan thread. Fausto's hijacked soooo many threads... he can spare one of his own 😀

 

[Aharami]

holy cojones maan :Q :Q

that ees one fast bike

 

[Aharami]

Originally posted by: Fausto
Kawasaki is claiming 172 horsepower at the crank without ram air, and roughly 180 horsepower at the crank with air being fed through the single nostril at the front of the bike.
Holy sh*t!! That's Hayabusa territory with 300 fewer cc's. :Q:Q

who makes the Hayabusa? ive never seen one...or heard of one

 

[Mr.IncrediblyBored]

Originally posted by: Aharami

Originally posted by: Fausto
Kawasaki is claiming 172 horsepower at the crank without ram air, and roughly 180 horsepower at the crank with air being fed through the single nostril at the front of the bike.
Holy sh*t!! That's Hayabusa territory with 300 fewer cc's. :Q:Q

who makes the Hayabusa? ive never seen one...or heard of one

Suzuki

Originally posted by: Fausto
The R1 is a much nicer-looking bike, IMO and the difference in performance between the two is completely moot at street speeds.

I agree. A shame because I'm trying to be a Kawasaki fanboy, but Yamaha keeps building better looking bikes that are just as capable on the track and around town.:frown:

 

[Fausto]

Originally posted by: Aharami

Originally posted by: Fausto
Kawasaki is claiming 172 horsepower at the crank without ram air, and roughly 180 horsepower at the crank with air being fed through the single nostril at the front of the bike.
Holy sh*t!! That's Hayabusa territory with 300 fewer cc's. :Q:Q

who makes the Hayabusa? ive never seen one...or heard of one

So....how's life under the rock anyway? 😛

It's made by Suzuki. Officially the "fastest production bike ever" since it slipped in just before the 300kph limit was agreed on the japanese manufacturers.

Pics and ride review. They're stupid-fast, but also long and pretty heavy.

 

[Mookow]

Originally posted by: Aharami

Originally posted by: Fausto
Kawasaki is claiming 172 horsepower at the crank without ram air, and roughly 180 horsepower at the crank with air being fed through the single nostril at the front of the bike.
Holy sh*t!! That's Hayabusa territory with 300 fewer cc's. :Q:Q

who makes the Hayabusa? ive never seen one...or heard of one

Teh funnay has been found!

 

[boyRacer]

Originally posted by: KnightBreed

Originally posted by: Aharami

Originally posted by: Fausto
Kawasaki is claiming 172 horsepower at the crank without ram air, and roughly 180 horsepower at the crank with air being fed through the single nostril at the front of the bike.
Holy sh*t!! That's Hayabusa territory with 300 fewer cc's. :Q:Q

who makes the Hayabusa? ive never seen one...or heard of one

Suzuki

Originally posted by: Fausto
The R1 is a much nicer-looking bike, IMO and the difference in performance between the two is completely moot at street speeds.

I agree. A shame because I'm trying to be a Kawasaki fanboy, but Yamaha keeps building better looking bikes that are just as capable on the track and around town.:frown:

Kawasaki is sucking pretty bad in motoGP... 🙁 ...along with Suzuki... 😕

 

[Apex]

Man, 375lb dry weight too! That's neck and neck with the 04 R1. I'd love to read a head to head.