<< Did you skim over the part where the American magazine covered probably all of the areas that the Finnish car reviewers do? I don't think a high priority is places on conveniences such as a cupholder, but they are nice to have. Nice elitist viewpoints you guys have. British car magazines are probably the best, though. They seem to have the least ass-kissing reviews of new cars. I've owned an Audi and the cupholders on it blew, I'm glad they finally put some functional ones in there. If your going to implement a feature and have it appeal to the target audience, then make sure it works right the first time. >>
I read the entire review. Overall, they loved the car! But, in the end, they had a short list of pros and cons of the car, and one of the things they complained about was "poor cup-holders". I just fail to see why cup-holders are important in a car. I would be alot more interested in features that are actually important, instead of focusing on features that are more or less useless in the big picture. But, I guess that's just one of the difference in finnish/European car-culture and american one. I mean, you do alot of things that are just plain weird to us, when it comes to cars.
Elitist? I don't think so. In finnish reviews, they mention if the car has cup-holders. It is a nice extra to have. But they don't shed any tears if the car doesn't have them or if they are poor.