2 gigs of Ram or 4 gigs?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

djnsmith7

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2004
2,612
1
0
My personal opinion here...I love using the analogy of comparing RAM to horsepower in a sports car...You really can't have too much (I'm saying this without getting too technical)...

Anyway, I plan on having 4 GB of RAM in my system in the near future...I would suggest starting out with 2 GB & once the rest of your components are top notch, add the additional 2 GB...
 

Rommels

Senior member
Sep 27, 2005
290
0
0
Originally posted by: Knavish
I don't have any sources for this info, but I'm pretty sure it's right. Can anyone else confirm?

In an nforce4 board 2x Dimms is good because you get the added dual-channel memory bandwidth. 4x Dimms is bad because it puts a higher electrical load on the memory bus, and the hardware usually backs off the memory timings. This slows the system down and I bet it would make OCing a lot harder.

This is why big server boards that support lots of DIMMs require Registered ram. Registered ram has a sets of registers sitting between the memory bus and the ram. This adds a minimal amount of extra time to the memory latency (you have to save the info to the register, and THEN the memory copies it from the register). The advantage here is that you don't have a really big electrical load when you add DIMMS -- you just have to charge a set of simple registers.

-Knavish


I agree with this...I have a friend who had 4GB in his and decided that it slower than 2GB so he just took two out. BTW it was OCZ Platinum.


Originally posted by: SnoMunke
Originally posted by: SophalotJack
I guess you could run without a page file on your HD if you ran a 4gb system. That would actually be pretty sweet.

Windows XP/Server requires a page file.

Yes it requires one but I think he was refering to running it in RAM.
As THIS SS I took of my page file setup show there is an option for no page file.

True Windows will still use one and always will no matter what.
I haven't noticed a difference anyways between running on the no page file option and running one.


Originally posted by: rod
Originally posted by: Rommels
Originally posted by: Tick
Originally posted by: SophalotJack
I guess you could run without a page file on your HD if you ran a 4gb system. That would actually be pretty sweet.
You don't need much of a page file under 2 gb either.
I do with just 2GB and don't notice any thing wrong.
Right now my PF usage is 387MB
Windows seems to write some stuff to a page file, even when your RAM is nowhere near full.

RoD

True dat true dat, Windows doesn't care what you say it will have a page file and there isn't any thing you can do about it.
 

SnoMunke

Senior member
Sep 26, 2002
446
0
0
you CAN run Windows without a page file...BUT there are many programs and parts of Windows itself that look for the page file... run at your own risk I guess.